Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 8 Notes -The Patriot

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 8 Notes – The Patriot – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the poem

Robert Browning’s ‘The Patriot’ is a brilliant piece of dramatic verse. It deals with the fickleness of public opinion and hero-worship. The same people who lift you up to the skies will also pull you down into the ditch. Even, in the midst of tragedy, the poem ends quite optimistically. Death is not the end of everything. The patriot hopes that since he did not receive his reward in this world, he will be rewarded in the other world. He feels safe in the hands of God. Thus the poem also becomes an expression of Browning’s optimistic philosophy of life. “God is in His heaven and all is well with the world.” This poem is a criticism of politics and people’s opinion. When a leader comes into power, people call him a patriot. When he is dethroned, the same leader is considered a traitor. This is the tragedy of modern politics. The leader in this poem fell a victim to the same state of affairs. When he came into power, people showered flowers at him as a patriot. But after a year, they declared him a traitor, when he was no more in power. They took him to the gallows. But Browning has ended his poem not on a tragic, rather on a next world optimistic note. It is a poem, which exposes the political changes in the third world countries in which patriots are branded as traitor in coups.

Central Idea

The central idea of the poem revolves around the rise and fall of one’s fortunes. The world is a dynamic, fickle and transient place. Here the opinions of people change rapidly, without lending much thought to justice and truth. The patriot is first hero worshipped and celebrated, but within a year he is taken down for execution. Justice is not meted out to him and he believes that real justice can only be delivered by God. By this he also creates a contrast between the fickle nature of the public and the divine nature of God.

Word Meanings

  1. Myrtle – a sweet smelling flower.
  2. Like mad – in great enthusiasm.
  3. Heave – breathe.
  4. Sway – rise and fall.
  5. Church-spires – tall, pointed structures on the top of church buildings.
  6. A year ago – it happened only a year back.
  7. Broke into a mist with bells – church bells rung to welcome the patriot.
  8. Rocked – shook.
  9. Repels – hateful.
  10. Yonder – that.
  11. Alack – alas.
  12. Leaped at the sun – tried to do the impossible.
  13. Nought – nothing.
  14. Harvest – reward.
  15. A year is run – a year has passed.
  16. A palsied few – few diseased persons, afflicted with paralysis.
  17. All allow – everyone admits.
  18. Shambles’ Gate – the gate leading to the place of execution.
  19. Better – better view of the execution.
  20. Scaffold – a platform where the criminal is executed by cutting of his head or hanging him by a rope.
  21. Foot – near.
  22. More than needs – unnecessarily.
  23. A rope cuts – the rope is so tight that it cuts both his hands.
  24. By the feel – from the feeling.
  25. Misdeeds – evil actions.
  26. Thus I entered – i entered the city as a hero.
  27. Thus I go – lam leaving as a disgraced prisoner.
  28. Collapse – die.
  29. Triumphs – victories.
  30. What dost thou owe me – what do you owe to me.
  31. Requite – reward.

Paraphrase

People welcomed the patriot back with pomp and ceremony. His path is laden with roses and myrtle, which signify love, respect and honour being showered on the patriot by the people. The residents of the town have clambered onto their roofs to get a glimpse of the patriot and welcome him home and showcase their gratuity. The house itself moves and sways with the weight and number of people. Even the church spires were decorated with fiery coloured flags. The bright colour of the flags made the church spires look like they were on fire and flames were engulfing them.

The ringing of the church bells infected the air and it seemed to be echoing the celebratory noise. The walls of the city, which were already on the verge of erosion, due to time, reflected the impact of the din created by the crowd. It seemed to conduct the tremors and move. The patriot tells the people how he doesn’t want all the cheers and applause, but wants the people to fetch the sun from the skies for him. He wants the power, glory, admiration and honour. He wants to live in their memories as an immortal hero. The crowd replies to his request with a query as to after this, what else does he require. He doesn’t want extravagant celebrations that can die down with time. He is looking for something more permanent. The sun is a symbol of immortality, power, honour and glory. Hence, the patriot asks the people to fetch him their sun from the skies. The answer of the crowd is reflective of their frivolous nature. They immediately ask the patriot what else he would require, other than the sun.

The patriot says that despite him asking the townspeople to get him the sun, in the end it was he who leaped for it and got it for the people, who he refers to as his beloved friends. “Alack!” or Alas indicates a tone of regret. The patriot mourns about how his deed has been repaid by the people. His “harvest” is what he has reaped, whereas what he had sown was bringing glory, power and honour to the people.

Summary

Like with many of Browning’s poems, this is a dramatic monologue being that the character is talking to himself in a ‘dramatic’ way. The poem tells the story of somebody’s execution in front of the public: for which he is being misunderstood and should not be killed. It relates very much to the fall of leaders who, like the patriot, are misunderstood and killed because of this.

The very title, ‘The Patriot’ is thought-provoking. A patriot is someone who fights/ works for their country. They love their country and wifi do anything for their country too.

The first stanza is used to set the scene of the poem creating contrasting setting. It starts with, ‘It was roses, roses, all the way’ which are known for being beautiful and a theme of love. However, the stanza describes how the ‘house-roofs seemed to heave and sway’ which suggest the setting is cramped with houses. This is our first signs of the poem being based in a town where people are living in poverty. This was common in the Victorian times which introduces a time to this poem too.

There is reference to a old tale of Icarus on the first line, ‘it was I who leaped at the sun’. Icarus attempted to fly by sticking feathers to his arm with wax. However, the closer he flew to the sun, the more the wax melted until he fell from the sky. Browning uses this story to introduce an ideology to not be too ambitious which unfortunately the patriot was. Throughout the whole of stanza, the patriot is reflecting and thinking . He states, ‘Nought man could do, have I left undone’. He feels he did everything he could have possibly done. We gather he also has power, ‘what I reap’ illustrating how he has collected his rewards from the work he has done.

Stanza four looks more at the setting again at how nobody is out to watch the patriot’s execution except ‘just a palsied few’. ‘Palsied’ is the term given to the old and riddled with disease. This juxtaposes against what the patriot has achieved in his life. We know he has power which is clearly not reflected with the amount and type of people watching his hanging. The people that are outside are gathering at ‘Shambles’ Gate’ which is a place people would congregate to watch public hangings. The public execution (which another name for it is ‘scaffold’) is starting to make the patriot lose all dignity.

This stanza carries on from where stanza four left off to describe the public humiliation the patriot is undergoing. Pathetic fallacy is used ‘I go in the rain’. As well as making the patriot wet it also reduces his dignity. The rain can also be seen to symbolise how the patriot is innocent as he is washed clean. As well as this, rain in general represents corruption creating a negative tense mood. This describes the public who are clearly corrupt for hanging somebody who has doing nothing wrong. He undergoes pain for the first time with ‘a rope cuts both my wrists behind’ and ‘For they fling…Stones at me for my year’s misdeeds’. We can tell he is coming close to the end as tension has been built through the weather and the change in behaviour of those watching.

The last stanza can be summed up as the stanza where the patriot finally dies. He comes to the conclusion that some people die from doing good, ‘In triumphs, people have dropped down dead’. At the very end, he refers back to religion to create a universal meaning to the poem, ‘Tis God shall repay: I am safer so’. He feels safe (even though he is dying) because he knows morally he has done right and God will see this. From this, he feels fairly safe that he will go to heaven and not hell (like the public want him to go). This links into Browning’s message for the poem who asks whether it is better to be out of the world of corruption where it will be more peaceful than to be in the world. This leaves the reader in a tranquillity of conscience to decide upon this deep ideology

Imagery is used extensively.Browning decides to open on the image of “roses”, because it connotes the love that our speaker would receive from the public. The idea of them being “all the way” suggests the interminable nature of the public’s devotion for him,

which acts an antithesis of his execution later in the poem. “The house-tops seemed to heave and sway’The heaving and swaying motion creates an image of overcrowding, emblematic of our speaker’s importance. It suggests that he is a celebrated figure – one that everyone wants to see.

The tone is significant in conveying the mood of the public.“A year ago on this very day” is significant as it diverts our attention to the past tense, “a year ago”, foreshadowing that something has changed. It develops the self-pitying voice of our speaker, and its unexpected placing at the end of stanza one is symbolic of the abrupt end to the public’s devotion towards the speaker. This symbolically abrupt change in tone accentuates the theme of ‘the fickleness of the public’ that Browning ensures embodies the narrative.

“And afterward, what else?” adds to the image of endless love that the speaker received from the public. Browning includes the voice of the crowd here to indicate that the speaker is not exaggerating, and it makes his fall from glory even more tragic. It also adds to the reader’s frustration at Browning’s ambiguity throughout the poem, as his narrative gaps mean that we don’t know what caused the speaker to go from being so respected and celebrated to being executed.

The line “Alack, it was I who leaped at the sun” is a mythical reference to Icarus suggesting that the speaker was overambitious and took a step too far. It also helps develop the characterisation of our speaker, as it suggests that it w’as his hubris that led. to him crossing the boundaries and consequently losing popularity.

“There’s nobody on the house-tops now” juxtaposes with the earlier image of the house-tops that would “heave and sway” with people. Browning manipulates time, bringing us out of the speaker’s retrospective of the past and into the present tense.

Use of pathetic fallacy, “I go in the rain” helps to add to the depressed mood, and could be argued to be emblematic of the speaker’s inner-cries and sadness.

Browning establishes a semantic field of pain in “cuts”, “bleeds” and “stones”. This juxtaposes starkly with the semantic field of love that had been established in the opening of the poem: instead of roses being thrown at him, now there are stones. This serves the sole purpose of accentuating the change in his status, and acting as a structural antithesis of the beginning of the poem.

The alliteration in the line “In triumphs, people have dropped down dead” where the ‘d’ sound adds to the overarching image of brutality-the brutality he is unfairly experiencing now for “triumphs”.

The poem ends on a religious metaphor-’Tis God shall repay: I am safer so”. It suggests that the speaker has now accepted his fate, and knows that he only has to answer to God now – not the fickle public. He feels “safer” with God, rather than in society. The idea of him feeling “safer” suggests he has no sins, nothing to worry about, once again, ending the poem on a rather innocent depiction of the speaker.

The poem has a symmetrical structure, with actions and setting from the first three stanzas being mirrored in the last three. However, the actions and setting have much more negative connotations within the last three stanzas (it’s a complete antithesis), which Browning uses to emphasise the tragic fall of this’patriot.

Browning also labels the stanzas with Roman Numerals. This helps guide the readers through the different stages of The Patriot’s life, while also making Browning’s narrative gaps more noticeable, as we realise that there are stages of his life being omitted.

The rhyme scheme of the poem is consistent and follows a strict ababa pattern. It is also significant that the rhyme scheme is asymmetrical, which subtly foreshadows the fall of our patriot.

The narrative is told from the first person perspective of The Patriot himself. His voice is retrospective and self-pitying. The voices of the crowd that Browning embeds into the poem help to characterise our speaker as truly honoured and admired, so it seems too fickle for the public’s opinion to change without reason. As a result, this makes us doubt the reliability of our speaker, who characterises himself as nothing other than innocent.

For More Resources

 

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 7 Notes – I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 7 Notes – I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the Poem

Caged Bird By Maya Angelou was first published in her book, “Shaker, Why Don’t You Sing?” in 1983. Inspired by Paul Laurence Dunbar’s poem “Sympathy,” Angelou contrasts the struggles of a bird attempting to rise above the limitations of adverse surroundings with the flight of a bird that is free. She seeks to create in the mind of the reader empathetic sentiment towards the plight of the misused, captured creature—a symbol of downtrodden African Americans and their experiences. The poem is a metaphor illustrating the differences between African-Americans and Whites during the civil rights era. The author, a black who grew up in the South during this era, is expressing her feelings at the discrimination she faced during her life. Her first autobiography published in 1970 is titled, “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings”

About the Poet

Maya Angelou (Marguerite Ann Johnson) was bom in St. Louis, Missouri, on April 4, 1928 to Bailey Johnson, a door attendant, a naval dietician, and Vivian Baxter Johnson, a nurse, a real estate agent and later a merchant marine. Angelou’s brother, Bailey Johnson Jr., gave her the nickname “Maya”. Maya Angelou is an American poet, memoirist, actress. Angelou is known for her series of six autobiographies starting with ‘I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings’, which was nominated for a National Book Award and has been called her magnum opus. Her volume of poetry, ‘Just Give Me a Cool Drink of Water ‘Fore I Die’ was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize. Angelou recited her poem, “On the Pulse of Morning” at President Bill Clinton’s inauguration in 1993. She has been highly honored for her body of work, including being awarded over 30 honorary degrees.Angelou became involved in American presidential politics in 2008 by placing her public support behind Senator Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party presidential nominee, despite her good friend Winfrey’s public support of Barack Obama. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings is an autobiography about the early years of author Maya Angelou’s life.

Maya Angelou’s racially centered poetry has a very powerful tone. Maya’s poem “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” is about the repression of the African American race. As a young black woman growing up in the South, and later in war time San Francisco, Maya Angelou faced racism from whites and poor treatment from many men.

I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings was written at the end of American Civil Rights movement. The poet was inspired by the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a leader in the American civil rights movement. A Baptist minister, he became a civil rights activist early in his career. King was assassinated on April 4, 1968, in Memphis, Tennessee.

Word Meanings

  1. caged bird – symbolizes the people from the black race who were discriminated by the white society which is symbolized by the free bird.
  2. cliped wings and tied feet – symbolize the disadvantage black people had because of their skin color.
  3. Breeze – symbolizes, the hope black people have that their situation will change someday.
  4. Downstream – symbolizes the common belief that the people with white skin are superior
  5. Free Mrd – white people
  6. Back of the wind – common thought that the white race is superior
  7. Bars of rage – anger black people felt
  8. Things unknown but longed for still – what would the world be like if blacks had the same rights as whites?
  9. caged bird singing – black people protesting

Paraphrase

A free bird flies and enjoys flying with the wind. A caged bird does not have freedom and is imprisoned between the bars. He cannot fly, so he sings. The caged bird sings about freedom because he cannot fly. The free bird can do whatever he wants, he has food and feels like the sky belongs to him. The caged bird dreams but cannot have his dreams come true and just sings. The caged bird sings about freedom because he cannot fly.

The free bird leaps on the back of the wind and floats downstream till the current ends and dips his wings in the orange sun rays and dares to claim the sky.

But a caged bird that stalks down his narrow cage can seldom see through his bars of rage.His wings are clipped and his feet are tied so he opens his throat to sing. The caged bird sings with fearful trill of the things unknown but for which he still longs and yearns.

His tune is heard on the distant hill for the caged bird sings of freedom

The free bird thinks of another breeze and the trade winds blow softly through the sighing trees and the fat worms wait on a dawn-bright lawn. The free bird names the sky his own. But the caged bird stands on the grave of his dreams. His shadow shouts a nightmare scream. His wings are clipped and his feet are tied so he opens his throat to sing as that is all he can do. The caged bird sings with a fearful trill of things unknown but for which he still longs. And his tune is heard on the distant hill for the caged bird sings of freedom.

Summary

Maya Angelou’s highly romantic “Caged Bird” first appeared in the collection Shaker, Why Don’t You Sing? in 1983.

The first two stanzas contrast two birds. Lines 1 through 7 describe the actions of a bird that is free; it interacts with nature and “dares to claim the sky.” The second stanza (lines 8 through 14) tells of a captured bird that must endure clipped wings, tied feet, and bars of rage; yet he still opens his throat and sings.

The third and fifth stanzas are identical. Lines 2, 4, and 6 and lines 5 and 7 of these identical stanzas rhyme. This repeated verse elaborates on the song of freedom trilled by the caged bird; though his heart is fearful and his longings unmet, the bird continues to sing of liberty. The fourth stanza continues the comparison of two birds, the caged and the free. The free bird enjoys the breeze, the trees, the winds, the lawn, the sky, and the fat worms; the caged bird with his wings still clipped and his feet still tied continues, nevertheless, to open his throat and sing. Like the refrain of a hymn, the fifth and final stanza is a reiteration.

Angelou’s characterization of a bird that is free (first and fourth stanzas) provides an effective contrast with the bird that is caged (second, third, fourth, and fifth stanzas). The sentiment that Angelou evokes in the reader is suggestive of Dunbar’s inspirational poem.

Critical Appreciation

The poem serves to provide a relevant piece of art that can withstand the test of time. It manages with ease to inspire a mass of people to better their lives by using the power of words, an honor prominent authors only dream about achieving. In today’s society many people struggle with the feeling of being under lock and key, unable to reach and are prevented from making any goals for themselves. The Poem ‘I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings’ discusses this dilemma.

I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou is arguably one of the most moving and eye opening poems ever written. It is clear that this title had great significance to Angelou, as it was the title of her entire life story. She often felt that her words were not heard because of the color of her skin. She felt that in some ways, she was still experiencing slavery. Although African American people were free people in Angelou’s time, there were still many restrictions on them in society, making it so that many black Americans did not feel free at all. This poem reveals the depth of those feelings. The poet uses the title, 1 Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, to emphasize the importance of liberty. To a caged bird, liberty is very important. The only liberty he has while he is imprisoned, is to sing.

Maya Angelou uses dramatic metaphors and detailed imagery to compare and contrast the differences between a caged bird and a free bird. With these descriptions, inferences * can be drawn to produce the much deeper meaning behind the symbol of a trapped bird.

The words were actually first written by one of the first nationally acclaimed African American poets, Paul Laurence Dunbar, in his poem, “Sympathy.”

I know what the caged bird feels, alas!
When the sun is bright on the upland slopes;

A, clearly not-so-happy, bird is throwing itself against the bars of its cage. It struggles so much that it begins to bleed and needs to stop, but once its wounds are healed, it tries again. It’s persistent. And in the final stanza, it sings a prayer, wishing to be free.

Angeloushe calls her young self a caged bird. So what’s her cage? What keeps her from freedom? And what cages her are racism, sexism, insecurity, poverty, and abuse. But no matter how many times these forces push against her, she continues to fight back.

Angelou gives us some insight into what the caged bird means for her in the last stanza:
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 7 Notes - I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings 1

Angelou’s bird is angry. In the rest of the poem, we learn that not only is it caged, but its wings are clipped and its feet are tied so it can barely move. While the free bird gets to fly around looking at all the awesome things life has to offer—like fat worms— the caged bird stands on “the grave of dreams.” Angelou’s bird has never been free, but it still sings a song of freedom. Singing is all Angelou’s bird can do. At first, she doesn’t even know what freedom is, but she understands that her life is not the one she wants. So she does what she can, singing her song, and by the end she’s a little bit closer to freedom.

Maya Angelou’s touching poem revolves around the theme of freedom. The poem is about the heroic of the perfect and good leader to guide the minority black race from out of suffering and lead them to get the acknowledgement that is given to majority of the white people. The first lines of the poem discuss what a free bird does. Angelou writes, “The free bird leaps / on the back of the wind / and floats downstream / till the current ends / and dips his wings / in the orange sun rays / and dares to claim the sky” (1-7). With these words we get a real sense of sensory experiences from giving the wind a back, to making the rays of sun something that can be touched or dipped. This adds to the intensity and impact of the poem right from the start. Notable characteristics of the free bird can be seen here as well. It leaves no stone unturned and is not afraid to try new things. It has a sense of adventure that is unparalleled and has a fighting spirit. When the writer says that the free bird “dares to claim the sky” she is saying that the free bird doesn’t wait for anyone to tell it to do something. It does what it waits and this defines its freedom.

The free bird is brought up later on in the poem for a second time. This instance describes what the bird is thinking about. It has dreams and can imagine and freely think of other things beyond himself and his environment. The author writes, “The free bird thinks of another breeze / and the trade winds soft through the sighing trees / and the fat worms waiting on a dawn-bright lawn / and he names the sky his own” (22-25). The ability of this bird to declare the sky as belonging to him shows confidence and self­assurance. This bird knows what it wants and not even the sky is the limit.

The caged bird on the other hand is very different from its free counterpart. The reader is introduced to the second bird quite dramatically. This serves to show the extant of how contrasting the two creatures are. Maya Angelou writes, “But a bird that stalks / down his narrow cage / can seldom see through / his bars of rage / his wings are clipped and / his feet are tied / so he opens his throat to sing” (8-14). The line that stands out the most is the fact that the birds’ wings are clipped. Wings give birds freedom to fly above the rest. It allows them to get from one point to the other. It is the ideological independence. Opening his throat to sing also gives a poignant image of pain and distress. Mostly the caged bird is suppressed. More is stated about the cries of the caged bird. It is a piercing sting of a song that spreads far and wide. Although the singing is full of pain, anger and fear, the bird sings of “things unknown.” The caged bird craves to learn about its surroundings. It dreams of a better life.

The issues of dreams and goals comes into question with the caged bird as well but in a different fashion. The author writes, “But a caged bird stands on the grave of dreams/ his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream/his wings are clipped and his feet are tied/so he opens his throat to sing” (26-29). These lines paint such a vivid image of dreams that cannot be fulfilled. A grave, for instance, is a symbol of death. A grave of dreams is rather grim. It shows an environment where dreams can’t be fulfilled. Instead of happy and positive dreams they are nightmares instead, nightmares that keep the caged bird grounded.

These two birds however serve to symbolize much more than what lies on the surface. As examined, the cage keeps the bird locked in unable to escape and enjoy the freedoms life has to offer. Maya Angelo grew up in a time and place where African Americans were segregated by law and were heavily discriminated against. These unfair laws are similar to the way the cage keeps the bird locked in. Also the caged bird sings and screams a dreaded tune. This was a way of rebellion and protest of the enslavement. A lot of African Americans at this time also used music as their means of defiance against unlawfulness. These songs although insignificant to outsiders served as a means of freedom.

The forms of ‘I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings’ is described as a lyric, written in combine Quintets and Quatrains stanzas. As lyric form, it is a short poem expressing personal thoughts and feelings. It is meditative.Each stanza follows the rhyming scheme of AAAB. The flexibility of the first two lines in the stanza following a rhyming scheme  symbolizes the imprisonment of the bird. Each stanza follows the rhyming scheme of AAAB (thrill, hill, shrill, freedom). The rigidity of the first three lines in following a rhyming scheme signifies the captivity of the bird. However, the last phrase of each stanza breaks off from the rhyme with the last word being far from the original rhyme: “trill, still, hill, freedom.

One of the stanzas is repeated, which brings attention to the idea of the caged bird singing for freedom. Repeating different words or phrases creates structure within a poem, and it helps readers focus on a specific thought or emotion that the poet would like them to notice.
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 7 Notes - I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings 2

This poem uses a metaphor to compare caged birds to African Americans fighting for equality during the civil rights movement. Metaphors compare two objects or concepts without using the words “like” or “as.”
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 7 Notes - I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings 3

In addition to using metaphor, Angelou utilizes repetition to reinforce the idea that African Americans cried out for freedom from oppression even in the bleakest of times when their oppressors did not want to “hear” them. Angelou repeats the third and fifth (final) stanzas, with the caged bird singing for freedom:

The caged bird sings/with fearful trill/of things unknown/but longed for still/and his tune is heard/on the distant hill/for the caged bird/sings of freedom.

In the above quotation, the end rhyme in the second, fourth, and sixth lines with “trill,” “still,” and “hill.” We also find end rhyme as well as alliteration in the second stanza of the poem, when Angelou describes how the caged bird is physically confined. In the second stanza, the caged bird is in “his narrow cage” and “can seldom see through/his bars of rage” (“seldom see” forms the alliteration, while “cage” and “rage” form the end rhyme).

There is vivid imagery in the first stanza when the free bird “dips his wing/in the orange, sun rays” and personification and alliteration in the fourth stanza when the caged bird’s “shadow shouts on a nightmare scream.” The repetition of the consonant “s” and giving the caged bird’s shadow the human quality of shouting, emphasizes the bird’s nightmarish existence living in confinement.

The tone of this poem is reflective and critical because it compares the situation of the black people to the one of the white people. The poem transmits the ideas that this situation is unfair

Many have grown to use this poem to symbolize different obstacles in their lives. This poem can represent a wide range of things from society, physical barriers, fear,addiction or any negative behaviour. The free bird can then represent the longing and desire for a better way of life. A better life is a universal desire.

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 6 Notes – Daffodils

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 6 Notes – Daffodils – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the Poem

The poem is a word picture of daffodils at Ullswater. In 1802 William and Dorothy Wordsworth’s visited Glencoyne Park. On 15th April 1802, they passed the strip of land at Glencoyne Bay, called Ullswater.

It is this visit that gave Wordsworth the inspiration to write this famous poem. The poem ‘Daffodils’, also known by the title ‘I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud’, is a lyrical poem written by William Wordsworth in 1804. William Wordsworth is a well-known romantic poet who believed in conveying simple and creative expressions through his poems. He once said, “Poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings: it takes its origin from emotion recollected in tranquility”

The poem was inspired by an event on 15 April 1802, in which Wordsworth and his sister Dorothy came across a “long belt” of daffodils. William Wordsworth wrote Daffodils on a stormy day in spring, while walking along with his sister Dorothy near Ullswater Lake, in England. He imagined that the daffodils were dancing and invoking him to join and enjoy the breezy nature of the fields.

Written some time between 1804 and 1807 (in 1804 by Wordsworth’s own account), it was first published in 1807 in Poems in Two Volumes, and a revised version was published in 1815. In a poll conducted in 1995 by the BBC Radio 4 Bookworm programme to determine the nation’s favourite poems, this poem came fifth. Often anthologised, the poem is commonly seen as a classic of English romantic poetry.

About the Poet

On April 7, 1770, William Wordsworth was born in Cocker mouth, Cumbria, England. Wordsworth’s mother died when he was eight—this experience shapes much of his later work. Wordsworth attended Hawkshead Grammar School, where his love of poetry was firmly established and, it is believed, he made his first attempts at verse. While he was at Hawkshead, Wordsworth’s father died leaving him and his four siblings orphans. After Hawkshead, Wordsworth studied at St. John’s College in Cambridge and before his final semester, he set out on a walking tour of Europe, an experience that influenced both his poetry and his political sensibilities. While touring Europe, Wordsworth came into contact with the French Revolution. This experience as well as a subsequent period living in France, brought about Wordsworth’s interest and sympathy for the life, troubles, and speech of the “common man.” In 1802, he returned to France with his sister on a four- week visit to meet Caroline. Later that year, he married Mary Hutchinson, a childhood friend, and they had five children together. In 1812, while living in Grasmere, two of their children—Catherine and John—died.

Equally important in the poetic life of Wordsworth was his 1795 meeting with the poet Samuel Taylor Coleridge. It was with Coleridge that Wordsworth published the famous Lyrical Ballads in 1798. Wordsworth’s most famous work, The Prelude (1850), is considered by many to be the crowning achievement of English romanticism. The poem, revised numerous times, chronicles the spiritual life of the poet and marks the birth of a new genre of poetry. Although Wordsworth worked on The Prelude throughout his life, the poem was published posthumously. Wordsworth spent his final years settled at Rydal Mount in England, travelling and continuing his outdoor excursions. Devastated by the death of his daughter Dora in 1847, Wordsworth seemingly lost his will to compose poems. William Wordsworth died at Rydal Mount on April 23, 1850, leaving his wife Mary to publish The Prelude three months later.

Central Idea

The central idea of the poem is the expression of the comfort and cheering the author finds in the beauty of observing the daffodils. The poem expresses the idea of communion with nature and the tranquillity it brings in our lives. The poem is a tribute to the beautiful daffodils and the joy that is inherent in nature.

Word Meanings

  1. Wander (Verb) – To walk slowly around or to a place, often without any particular sense of purpose or direction.
  2. Float (Verb) – To move slowly on water or in the air.
  3. Vale (Noun) – Valley
  4. Fluttering (Noun) – A quick, light movement.
  5. Toss (Verb) – To move one’s head this way or that.
  6. Sprightly (Adjective) – Full of life and energy.
  7. Outdo (Verb) – Surpass.
  8. Glee (Noun) – A feeling of happiness.
  9. Gay (Adjective) – Happy and full of fun.
  10. Jocund (Adjective) – Cheerful
  11. Gaze (Verb) – To look steadily at somebody /something for a long time.
  12. Pensive (Adjective) – Thinking deeply about something, especially because you are sad or worried.
  13. Bliss (Noun) – Extreme happiness.
  14. Solitude (Noun) – The state of being alone, especially when you find this pleasant.

Critical Appreciation

This simple poem, one of the loveliest and most famous in the Wordsworth canon, revisits the familiar subjects of nature and memory, with a particularly (simple) spare, musical eloquence. The plot is extremely simple, depicting the poet’s wandering and his discovery of a field of daffodils by a lake, the memory of which pleases him and comforts . him when he is lonely, bored, or restless. The characterization of the sudden occurrence of a memory—the daffodils “flash upon the inward eye / Which is the bliss of solitude”— is psychologically acute, but the poem’s main brilliance lies in the reverse personification of its early stanzas. The speaker is metaphorically compared to a natural object, a cloud— “I wandered lonely as a cloud / That floats on high…”, and the daffodils are continually personified as human beings, dancing and “tossing their heads” in “a crowd, a host.” This technique implies an inherent unity between man and nature, making it one of Wordsworth’s most basic and effective methods for instilling in the reader the feeling the poet so often describes himself as experiencing.

This poem, is well-loved because of its simple yet beautiful rhythms and rhymes, and its rather sentimental topic. The poem consists of four six-line stanzas, each of which follow an ababcc rhyme scheme and are written in iambic tetrameter, giving the poem a subtle back-and-forth motion that recalls the swaying, daffodils. The poem comprises four stanzas and each stanza has six lines. There is the use of alliteration and assonance. The poet has used simile in the title of the poem and in the second stanza. Daffodils are animated as dancing and further personified as ‘sprightly’. Metaphors like inward eye and the heart can be found in the poem. The language is simple in this poem. By comparing himself to a cloud in the first line of the poem, the speaker signifies his close identification with the nature that surrounds him. He also demonstrates this connection by personifying the daffodils several times, even calling them a “crowd” as if they are a group of people.

The poem goes through a gradual shift:from wandered lonely (line 1) to but be gay (line 15) and pleasures fill (line 23). This in actual reflects Wordsworth’s life. The feeling of loneliness was marked by the death of his brother John. Dorothy had been a great sister to Wordsworth and also Wordsworth got married in the same year 1802 (his second marriage). These life events were actually responsible for Wordsworth’s happiness in his life and thus correlates with the joyful Daffodils.

Daffodils analysis will be incomplete without illustrating the tone of the poem. This poem is typically Wordsworth an. It portrays Nature at its best and encompasses her grace to the pinnacle which every poet cannot reach. It projects Wordsworth’s extraordinary delight in understanding and exploring common place things. Emotions recollected in tranquility are the distinct factor which differentiates Wordsworth from other poets. The emotions associated with Wordsworth in this poem, Daffodils is not ephemeral but rather permanent and everlasting. The poet derives the same bliss from his thoughts about the daffodils as when he actually saw them.

They flashed upon the inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude:
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dance with the daffodils.

The first three stanzas deal with the description of the nature whereas last stanza is the recollection of the poet’s experiences. Another important romantic element is the spontaneous expression of personal emotion in simple and ordinary language: this was the revolution brought about by the Romantic Movement.

In his lonely condition, he could be compared to a cloud floating in the sky over hills and valley. All at once he saw a large number of golden daffodils growing under the trees on the bank of the lake. A light breeze was blowing and the daffodils moved gently and danced merrily in the breeze. The daffodils grew along the bank of the lake in a line that extended as far as the poet’s eyes could reach. They looked like a continuous line of stars shining in the Milky Way. The flowers were so many that the poet imagined he could have seen at least ten thousand of them at a glance.

They were tossing their heads in a merry dance. The waves in the lake were dancing too. But the daffodils excelled the dancing waves in happiness. It was quite natural for a poet to feel happy in such a delightful company. The beautiful sight filled him with a great joy, and he kept gazing at the flowers for a long time. At that time he did not, however, realize how valuable this scene would prove to him in the years to come. Later, whenever the poet lay on his couch in a sad or thoughtful mood the daffodils would flash in his imagination. He acknowledges that one of the greatest blessings that solitude can offer is that old memories can be easily and vividly revived. The memory of the daffodils would immediately fill his heart with pleasure and he would begin to dance along with the flowers.And then the poet’s mind starts dancing along with the daffodils as the sheer memory of them is enough to feel his heart with ecstasy. The poem, in this way is not only a description of natural beauty but also a celebration of the fact that nature is always a source of inspiration for people.

The idea of remembering the beauty of nature even when not in its presence appears in several of Wordsworth’s later poems, including “Tintern Abbey,” “Ode; Intimations of Immortality,” and “The Solitary Reaper.” Even though the speaker is unable to appreciate the memory he is creating as he stands in the field, he later realizes the worth that it takes on in sad and lonely moments.

The title is apt as the whole poem is about the daffodils and how they have become a source of perennial joy to him.

The poem depicts a clear shift from the real world full of tensions to the utopian world of nature where peace and happiness prevail. The very opening line , ‘ I wandered lonely as a cloud,’ shows the poet’s sense of loneliness. There is then a sudden shift to the beautiful world of nature where the beautiful flowers capture his attention, and he is transported to another world of bliss.

The form of the poet is a lyric. It gives expression to a single feeling of joy in nature. It is short and musical and appeals more to the heart than the intellect. The poet uses various literary devices. Personification is used when he compares himself to a ‘cloud’ and the daffodils to a ‘crowd’. He uses similes when he compares his idle wanderings to a cloud floating over hills and valleys. He then compares the dancing daffodils to the twinkling stars in the sky.

As for structure the poem is divided into four stanzas- each having six lines with the rhyme scheme of ababcc in iambic tetrameter.

Alliteration can be seen in the line,’ I gazed and gazed.’
Inversion is evident : ‘For oft, when on my couch I lie’.
The ‘inward eye’ refers metaphorically to the poet’s memory.
The poem has a light and delicate sound that reminds us of a dance. It is the dance of the speaker’s heart, described at the end of the poem. The stanzas are like mini-poems that share the same form and subject matter.

One of the big ideas of Romanticism is the notion that the spiritual vision – the imagination – can hold greater truths than those given by our senses. We can never fully express what goes on in our imagination, but the notion of an “inner eye” captures the sense of reality that it gives us. Wordsworth is all about that “inner eye.”

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 5 Notes – Television

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 5 Notes – Television – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the Poem

‘Television’ is one of Roald Dahl’s best-known poems. It is a long didactic poem. It has a message relevant to our times. It’ is about the negative effects that television can have on young minds. It also offers the advice that children should read books instead of watching television. This poem appeals to young readers and older ones alike, for the amusing tone that it takes in approaching its subject. Dahl believed that young people need to experience life to really grow and thrive. He was concerned that watching too-much television worked against actualizing a child’s potential. He made his feelings known about that in the poem called “Television.”

Roald Dalai seems to have entered into every contemporary British household as he’s writing this poem. Living as he did in the twentieth century, he saw the introduction of many, many new and innovative electronic products. The television was one of those products, and perhaps the most controversial one among them. Even now, the effects of watching television for long hours are discussed in certain circles with some amount of disapproval. Dahl is quite the vocal one of that company. He also takes the opportunity to create a parallel landscape in which books abound, and are found everywhere within the house. Such a landscape, he is sure, will encourage children to read.

About the Poet

Roald Dahl was a British novelist, short story writer, poet, screenwriter, and fighter pilot. He (1916-1990) was born in Wales to Norwegian parents. A prolific writer, he was a member of the British Royal Air Force, during World War II. He was known as a flying ace. After the war, he became a writer who gained world-wide admiration. His stories for children are still being made into films.

Dahl served in the Royal Air Force during World War 11, in which he became a flying ace and intelligence officer, rising to the rank of acting wing commander. He rose to prominence in the 1940s with works for both children and adults and became one of the world’s best-selling authors. He has been referred to as “one of the greatest storytellers for children of the 20th century”. Among his awards for contribution to literature, he received the World Fantasy Award for Life Achievement in 1983, and Children’s Author of the Year from the British Book Awards in 1990. In 2008 The Times placed Dahl 16th on its list of “The 50 greatest British writers since 1945”.

Dahl’s first published work, inspired by a meeting with C. S. Forester, was “A Piece of Cake” on 1 August 1942. His first children’s book was The Gremlins, published in 1943, about mischievous little creatures that were part of RAF folklore. All the RAF pilots blamed the gremlins for all the problems with the aircraft. Dahl went on to create some of the best-loved children’s stories of the 20th century, such as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Matilda, James and the Giant Peach, The Witches, Fantastic Mr Fox, The BFG, The Twits and George’s Marvellous Medicine. Dahl also had a successful parallel career as the writer of macabre adult short stories, usually with a dark sense of humour and a surprise ending. The Mystery Writers of America presented Dahl with three Edgar Awards” for his work. He died on 23 November 1990, at the age of 74 of a blood disease in Oxford, and was buried in the cemetery at St Peter and St Paul’s Church in Great Missenden, Buckinghamshire, England.

Central Idea

In this poem, Dahl wishes to warn readers about how television can have the effect of dulling children’s minds. Watching television can make children unimaginative, and prevent them from enjoying the fairy tales they are supposed to like. On the other hand, reading is a good habit for children. It sharpens their minds, and introduces them to whole new worlds they never knew existed. Therefore, Dahl requests parents to bring back the books they had read before the invention of television back into their homes.

Word Meanings

  1. Gaping (V) – Watching with eyes wide open for a,long time
  2. Loll (V) – Sit, lie or stand in a lazy, relaxed way
  3. Slop (V) – Laze around
  4. Lounge about (V) – To be idle
  5. Hypnotised (V) – Fascinated
  6. Punch (V) – Hit with fist
  7. Tot (N) – Child
  8. Rots (N) – Decays by the action of bacteria and fungi
  9. Clutters (V) – Covers or fills something with an untidy collection of things
  10. Fantasy (N) – A genre of imaginative fiction involving magic and adventure especially in a setting other than the real world
  11. Rust (V) – Forming a red or orange coating on the surface of iron when exposed to air and moisture
  12. Gadzooks (N) – An expression of surprise
  13. Nursery (N) – A room in a house for the special use of young children
  14. Galore (Adj) – In abundance
  15. Gypsies (N) – Groups of travelling people with dark skin and hair traditionally living by itinerant trade and fortune telling
  16. Smugglers (N) – A person who moves goods illegally into our out of a country
  17. Muffled (Adj) – Not loud sound because of being obstructed in some way
  18. Oars (N) – Poles with flat blade, used to row or steer a boat through water
  19. Cannibals (N) – People who eat the flesh of human beings
  20. Rotter (N) – A cruel, mean or unkind person
  21. Rump-(N) – The hind part of the body of the mammal
  22. Ridiculous (Adj) – Deserving or inviting mockery
  23. Nauseating (Adj) – Causing a feeling of disgust
  24. Foul (Adj) – Offensive to the senses, especially through having a disgusting smell or taste or being dirty
  25. Repulsive (Adj) – Arousing intense distaste or disgust

Paraphrase

In lines 1-6 , Roald Dahl is addressing all British parents and telling them that the most important thing one must learn while raising children is to keep them away from the television set. He also says that it is possible to come to a better solution to the problem by not installing a television set in their homes in the first place.

In lines 7-12, Dahl speaks as if he has undertaken a long research on the bad effects of watching television by visiting a large number of households in Britain. In most houses, he has found the children lazing about all day and staring at the television screen without doing any productive work at all. Next, he indulges in a bit of exaggeration that is nonetheless amusing when he says that sometimes the children stare so hard that their eyeballs fall off & he has seen a dozen eyeballs rolling about on the floor in one house.

In lines 13-16, Dahl says that children entire attention is captured by the television screen and they cannot concentrate on anything other than what they are watching.

In lines 17-24, Dahl admits that he knows that television can be a convenient way to keep children occupied. While watching television, children never cause trouble or throw tantrums. As a result, their parents can go about doing their household chores without any interruption. However, parents do not stop to consider what television might do to their children.

Lines 25-33 are written in capitals to emphasize that they carry the main message of the poem. This message is that watching too much television fills up the mid of children with useless facts while at the same time destroying their ability to create or understand worlds of fantasy in their imagination. It takes away their ability to think and they can only keep staring at the television screen

In lines34-37, Dahl anticipates what the parents’ next question would be. They might agree to take away the television set from their children but will ask how they are supposed to now keep their children entertained and occupied

In lines 38-41, Dahl tells parents that they cannot have forgotten how children kept themselves entertained before the recent invention of the television.

In lines 42-48, Dahl says that before the coming of television children would read and it is a shame that now they don’t.

In lines 49-52, Dahl creates the alternate landscape that has been mentioned in the section on the poem’s setting. In this landscape, children’s rooms are filled to the brim with books.

In lines 53-62, Dahl talks about the kind of typical fantasy stories that the children would read in his day. These were stories of adventure with many interesting characters.

In lines 63-72, Dahl pays a tribute to another children author like him- Beatrix Potter. Potter’s books were known for the use of animals as characters, and the various colourful illustrations.

In lines 73-80, Dahl makes an earnest appeal to parents to throw away their television set and replace it with a bookshelf, ignoring all the objection of their children.

In lines 81-85, Dahl feels sure that sooner or later the children will turn to reading books to pass the time.

In lines 86-94, Dahl says that the children will not be able to stop reading books once they have started & then will wonder why they had ever liked watching television. In the end the children will thank their parents for introducing them to books.

Summary

‘Television’ consists of a total of 94 lines. The poet stresses about the importance of books in the lives of the children and most importantly, how this passion for books has been substituted with the addiction for television. The poet highlights the vitality of books which are, however, ignored because of television. The poet feels that television is like an evil which hinders the growth of brains for the children and hampers their creativity.The poet starts the the poem with the old saying by elders to keep the children away from the television set. The poet has made this statement very aggressively. He compares the television set to be as bad as an idiot box.

Next, the poet says that it is not uncommon to see the children sitting and staring continuously at the television sets. In almost every house, the same scene is to be seen. The children are so obsessed at watching television, they sit in awkward poses. The children do not even care about how are they sitting ,or if they are in fact sitting also or just about to fall from the couch they are sitting on, but the mast interesting part is that their eyes will be deeply focused at the television sets. They do not even care about their eyes. It would feel as if their eye balls will come out, but still they would not be tired of watching the TV.

The poet is then referring to his own experience where he went to someone’s house and was astonished to see so many people staring at the TV continuously as if they were sitting in front of the TV since very long. It looked as if they were hypnotized by the scenes in the TV. They stare continuously and do not even blink their eyes once. It seems as if they have the hang-over of watching the TV, which is nothing more than a junk box.

The poet believes that it is the TV set which make the children immobile. They are in a sedentary position all day and thus, do not move out of the house to play or undertake any physical exercises or sports etc. They do not even move out, mingle with each other, play together or even fight. This hampers their physical ability and growth. Not only their _ physical fitness, even their brains stop working.

The poet then refers to the lack of the personal touch that parents have with their children. The small arguments and even scoldings are also essential in life, else it becomes very dull. In this case, the children in a way are lost in their own aloof world and do not care about anything else. They do not demand any time from the parents. The parents are free to do their own work. This way, an unusual silence comes in the relationships and the personal touch is lost.

But here, is the role of an ideal parent. The poet is shaking the consciousness of the parents in the next part of the poem. He is informing about the ill effects the TV sets.

The TV sets make the children dull, and spoils the important senses in the brains of the child. The imagination and creativity is also jammed and the innovative thinking is also dead. The child stops thinking on his or her own and only fusses on the facts and knowledge he gets from the TV, his own sense of creativity is lost in this case. His thought process stops and corrodes as if it is filled with rust and freezes.

The poet next, focuses on the dilemma suffered by the parents. The parents understand that the televisions are of course not good for the development and growth of their child, but then what should they do to entertain the children? The substitute for television needs to be thought about, which is as entertaining as the TV sets and even overcomes the flaws which TV has. The answer to this is quite simple. In order to get the answer, the parents should take their thinking prior to the time when TV set was invented. In the good old times, children used to get entertained as well without the TV sets. The poet is taking everyone to the past and emphasises on the time when children read books.

The poet now requests the parents to throw away the television sets and instead get those old book shelves and lovely books back to its place. Children should have a lovely book shelf hanging on the wall, which will increase the beauty of the wall. And then, only the shelf is not enough, it should be filled will books and many books. This action by the parents will not be liked by the children at first and the children might oppose this by different actions like screaming, shouting and even worse. But the parents should give in. Things will settle down on their own in some time.

And once they will start reading the books, the real joy will come then. They themselves will understand the joy of reading and soon will gain interest. These books will make their own place in the hearts of the children and they will become fond of reading. That will be the day when they will realize that they had been wasting a lot of their precious time in watching the television. They will understand the worth of the books and how worthless it was watching television. The children will love you (parents) all the more for throwing away the television and bringing them near to the books. Thus, finally, he requests the parents to do away with the television sets from their homes and instead place a nice book shelf at its place and fill it with good books. This will aid the children build their knowledge, creativity and at the end, will make them successful. No matter, the children might rebel at this change and even argue and fight with the parents to throw away their favourite television, but at the end, they will be benefitting out of it. And a day will come, when they will acknowledge and thank the parents for doing so.

Critical Appreciation

In this poem, Dahl wishes to warn readers about how television can have the effect of dulling children’s minds. Watching television can make children unimaginative, and prevent them from enjoying the fairy tales they are supposed to like. On the other hand, reading is a good habit for children. It sharpens their minds, and introduces them to whole new worlds they never knew existed. Therefore, Dahl requests parents to bring back the books they had read before the invention of television back into their homes.

The poet makes the television set like an evil which hinders the growth of brains of the children and hampers their creativity. The poet starts the piece of the poem with the old saying by elders to keep the children away from the television set. The poet has made this statement very aggressively. He compares the television set to be as bad as an idiot box. One should keep the children away from the television set or may be the best part would be instead, never install the television sets in the house. The poet is shaking the consciousness of the parents in the poem. He is informing about the ill effects the TV sets causes to the lovely children. The TV sets makes the children dull, and spoils the important senses in the brains of the child. The imagination and creativity is also jammed and the innovative thinking is also dead.

That the television is called the ‘idiot box’ might have something to do with the kinds of effect Dahl imagines it has in children. This phrase is actually a transferred epithet, in the sense that it is not the television set that is idiotic, but that idiocy is produced in the watchers of television. When we watch television, it is a passive process on our parts. We do not actively engage with the material as we do while reading and imagining the words on the page coming to life. This passivity ultimately makes the work of our brain slower and more strained.

Amidst all the people of his time, Dahl was perhaps singularly ahead of his time when he predicted that television would spell the death of imagination in children’s minds. As a children’s author, he must have known more than others how children’s faces light up when they read or listen to a story, and how they often lose themselves in the details of a book as their imagination constructs entire worlds for them in their minds. However, television hands them ready images. As a result, their imagination suffers and they later become sceptical in thinking that what they cannot see is not real. If all children thought that way, an author like Dahl would actually go out of business.

Even though Dahl was writing primarily for children, the message of this particular poem seems more intended for their parents than for them. Dahl believes that it is a parent’s duty to inculcate the habit of reading in his or her children. Children might not know any better than watching television for hours, but parents do. In their hurry to get all their work finished, they ignore their children’s long hours of television-watching. However, by putting their own convenience aside, they should introduce their children to the wonderful world of books.

Roald Dahl always wrote keeping his audience in mind. Therefore it is no surprise that the tone of this poem is light, amusing and entertaining. He obviously meant for his  readers’ to not feel that he was preaching to them.

Despite its light tone, the message of this poem still rings true for its readers. That a book can open up one’s mind is a lesson that every writer wants his readers to know. The tone of this poem is contrary to what has led the poet to pen his thoughts here. Dahl is a man who lived through a period of great many inventions, including that of television. However, he is not excited by this so-called progress and development of the human race. He hankers for the olden days when life was simpler, and little pleasures were more easily experienced. He associates television with the loss of innocence in children. He is saddened to see that children do not any longer read books as ardently as they used when he was younger. He longs to change this, and ‘Television’ comes out of his meagre attempt to do so. In characteristic style, his aim is both to entertain and edify his readers – young and old alike.

This rhetorical device is used when a poet addresses his or her poem to an absent audience. Dahl uses the device of apostrophe when he addresses his poem to English parents and advises them on doing away with their television sets.

This rhetorical device is used to give human qualities to something that is incapable of human actions. Dahl uses the device of personification in two cases – first, when he gives television the human ability to kill something, and second, when he gives ‘Imagination’ the human ability to die at its hands.

The other device used by Dahl is the hyphen. The pause made by the he hyphen gives a sense of hanging. It means to invite the readers to read and think at a certain pace. As a result, voice is able to make the up and down to the emotional effect and in the same time infiltrate the readers with a continuous meaning transfer.

Any type of font does not changes the meaning of the words. But the font changing in the middle of a written line will change the focus and the emphasis. Here, the poet uses capitalized word for all words in the line 25-33 in a row.

Roald Dahl follows the same simple rhyme scheme throughout this poem – AABB and so on in a series of rhyming couplets. Only on one occasion does he diverge from this when the end words of the lines rhyme in lines 31, 32 & 33.

Thus we see that stylistic techniques used show the intention and/or the reason of the poet in making the poem which is usually hidden. Dahl adeptly uses language, style etc to highlight the ill effects of television versus the positive results of reading. 

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 4 Notes – After Blenheim

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 4 Notes – After Blenheim – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the Poem

“After Blenheim” is an anti- war poem written by English Romantic poet laureate Robert Southey in 1796. It was written in the form of a ballad. “After Blenheim” is also known as “The Battle of Blenheim.” Blenheim is the English name for the German village of Blindheim, situated on the left bank of the Danube River in the state of Bavaria in southern Germany.

It centers on the most famous battle in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701­1714). In November 1700, the grandson of King Louis XIV of France acceded to the throne of Spain as Philip V. Austria and other European nations saw this development as an unfair manoeuvre by Louis to increase his power and influence. Consequently, war broke out in 1701 between Austria and France.

Robert Southey’s ballad offers a particular perspective on one of the most famous battles of the eighteenth century. In 1704, in the War of the Spanish Succession, a coalition of forces, including the English, defeated the French and Bavarian armies at Blenheim.

Southey does not describe the battle directly but, through the conversation between an old farmer and his grandchildren, it gradually emerges that the setting is a former battleground. Peterkin has found something Targe and round’, which his grandfather explains is a skull, one of many to be found in the earth nearby.

Old Kaspar describes the battle and the loss of life. He offers an explanation to the children about why the battle was fought? In spite of the graphic description of bodies ‘rotting in the sun’ and little Wilhelmine’s belief that it was a ‘wicked thing’, the line that Southey frequently repeats has Old Kaspar saying that the battle was ‘a famous victory’. Inevitably, we are encouraged to think about the purpose and validity of war. Many years later, Southey altered his pacifist, questioning view of the war.

About the Poet

Robert Southey was an independent-minded young man who was expelled from Westminster School for opposing flogging. He developed radical religious and political ideas and, at one stage, considered emigrating to America with his friend Samuel Taylor Coleridge to set up a utopian commune.

The idea was abandoned, and Southey began writing plays and poems and, in particular, developed the ballad form in poems such as ‘After Blenheim’ and ‘The Inchcape Rock’.

He was “a prolific writer of verse and histories and an accomplished biographer, who wrote The Life of Nelson. If he was not as original and successful in his poetry as contemporaries such as Wordsworth, his prose is highly skilful. Byron called it ‘perfect’, although he felt that Southey had compromised his beliefs for money and fame.

In the early period of his life Southey was a radical republican influenced by the great Thomas Paine and by the early optimistic years of the French Revolution. In 1794, even before he had written After Blenheim, Southey had written a ‘dramatic poem’ in three acts called Wat Tyler. As its name gives away, this was a play about the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381. At the start of the play Wat Tyler and his friend Hob Carter are found in Tyler’s blacksmith’s shop in Deptford indignantly discussing the new ‘poll’ tax being imposed by the Crown to pay for its wars in France.

Southey gradually lost his radical opinions and became much more of an establishment figure. Fie was appointed Poet Laureate in 1813.

Central Idea

The poem conveys the futility of war. Thousands of lives are lost of innocent people and of soldiers. But what is achieved except destruction and death. No one knows why these wars are fought , they just believe whatever they are told. Terrible consequences are part of war is what everyone believes. The poem gives an idea of the real value to men of such famous victories as that of Blenheim which is just senseless and useless destruction and loss of human life.

Word Meanings

  1. Sported – played
  2. Green – grass fields
  3. Rivulet – small stream.
  4. Rout – defeated, made to flee.
  5. Ploughshare – the main cutting blade of a plough, behind the coulter.
  6. Slain – killed
  7. Wonder-waiting – awestruck, surprised, expectant.
  8. Quoth – said
  9. Yon – (archaic) there, nearby.
  10. Dwelling – house
  11. To fly – fled
  12. Rest his head – to take shelter
  13. Childing mother – pregnant woman
  14. Wasted – destroyed, razed to the ground.

Paraphrase

Old Kaspar has finished his work and is sitting in the sun in front of the cottage, watching his little granddaughter at play. Peterkin, his grandson, has been rolling a hard round object he found near the stream. He brings it to the old man, who explains “Tis some poor fellow’s skull,” he says.He admits that he often finds them while ploughing in the garden. The children anticipate a story—”And little Wilhelmine looks up/with wonder ­waiting eyes”. Kaspar explains to the children the story of the battle, that the Duke of Marlborough routed the French, although he admits he never understood the reason for the war himself.

Kaspar then mentions that his father had a cottage by the rivulet—”My father lived at Blenheim then”—where Peterkin found the skull. The soldiers burnt he houses down and killed the villagers with swords. His father and mother had fled, with their child. Kaspar recounts how thousands were killed in the war and among the dead were pregnant women and even children But then this was the collateral of war and it was a great victory says Kaspar.

Thousands of corpses lay rotting in the fields, but he shrugs it off, as part of the cost of war. . Wilhelmine says it was a wicked thing, but he contradicts her, saying that ‘no, it was a great victory. Peterkin questions him asking what good resulted from the war . Kaspar answers that he did not know but everyone said that it was a great victory.

Summary

One evening in fields around the Bavarian town of Blenheim in southern Germany, an elderly farmer named Kaspar sits in front of his cottage watching his grandchildren, Wilhelmine and Peterkin, at play. Peterkin is rolling an object he found near a stream. He takes it to Kaspar and asks what it is. The old man, who has found many such objects while plowing the fields, replies that it is the skull of a soldier who died in the Battle of Blenheim. Their curiosity aroused, the children ask him about the battle and why it was fought. The English routed the French, he says, in what later generations would call a great and famous victory. However, Kaspar is at a loss to explain the cause of the battle. He does know that thousands died in it—not only soldiers but also townspeople, including children. In fact, the fields were littered with corpses. But such terrible consequences are part of war, he says. They do not negate the glory of the victory. Wilhelmine then comments that the battle was “a wicked thing,” but Kaspar tells her she is wrong. “It was a famous victory,” he says. Peterkin asks what good came of the fighting. Kaspar says he does not know, but adds, ” ’twas a famous victory. He told them that a great battle had been fought there, and many of the leaders had won great renown. But he could not tell why it was fought or what good came of it. He only knew that it was a “great victory.” That was the moral of so many of the wars that devastated Europe for centuries. The kings fought for more power and glory; and the peasants fled from burning homes, and the soldiers fell on the fields. The poem gives an idea of the real value to men of such famous victories as that of Blenheim.

Critical Appreciation

After Blenheim’ is a poem about an old man who is sitting in front of his cottage, watching his Grandson playing on the grass. Incidentally, this cottage was situated very near where the Battle of Blenheim was fought between the English and the French many years ago. When the boy was playing on the grass, he found a skull slightly buried in the ground; he took the skull to his grandfather and asked him what it was. The old man said that it must have been a skull from the famous Battle of Blenheim, which was fought there many years ago. The boy asked his Grandfather to tell him about the battle. The poet starts by saying that the Battle was a ‘Great Victory’, and he repeats this idea throughout the entire poem, at the end of nearly every stanza. This poem is separated into 11 equal verses. Rhyme is used to speed up the poem.

After Blenheim is a poem that illustrates the pointlessness of war. Written 94 years after the Battle of Blenheim at the war ground, it is the aftermath of war. It tells the story of an old man and his grandchildren. Old Kasper is sitting outside his cottage when his grandson Peterkin finds a skull. Old Kasper begins to tell the Peterkin and his sister about the Battle of Blenheim that once took place there. In each verse Old Kasper explains a violent scene of bloodshed and death:

“With fire and sword the country round…
And newborn baby died:”

The war caused devastation and hundreds of killings. Old Kasper has a casual attitude towards this claiming that ‘things like that must be’. His gruesome descriptions, followed by his casual sayings create an effect of irony. It is ironic that it was a great war but no one knows why. Old Kasper is a farmer and finds a lot of skulls when he ploughs his fields. This again shows rebirth.

The first indication that something is not right is the introduction of the skull. The poet talks of the child finding something ‘large and smooth and round’ which immediately makes the reader think of a football or similar toy. When it is revealed that the child has found a skull, this makes us feel very uneasy and we know that this is not a poem about pleasant English summer evenings. The thought of the child, so innocent, playing with something so gruesome as a skull and not realising what it was is very shocking. The language changes again in stanza eight when the poet says, ‘And new bom baby died’ this immediately jerks you into another emotion and situation within the poem. For example when the poet says words like, ‘fled’, ‘died’, ‘bodies’ and ‘shocking’ and so on, it is especially effective when he says, ‘newborn baby died’ because the death of someone so very young and completely innocent is very shocking.

He is also using this imagery to describe the soldiers in war who die fighting for the survival of kingdoms. Is this what human life has come to as a result of war? Worth nothing. The poets feelings about war is that they are catastrophically phenomenal, and leave hundreds of people without their homes, and without each other, completely destroyed. Wars affect everyone on a large scale. In ‘After Blenheim’, the poet repeats that the Battle of Blenheim was a huge and great victory for the English. He is saying that he believes that wars always end for one side in a great victory, usually achieved for a good cause but for the other side they are a total failure and the costs are huge.

In several stanzas, Southey uses alliteration to promote rhythm and euphony. Stanza five is an example.
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 4 Notes - After Blenheim 1
Various themes are woven into the poem. The poet talks about the inhumanity to man. War represents the worst form of human behavior: “man’s inhumanity to man”. The skull Peterkin finds, as well as those that Kaspar regularly unearths while plowing, are mute testimony to the truth of this observation. The poem implies that the perpetrators of war cannot or will not suppress wayward ambitions that provoke a violent response. The children—as yet uncorrupted by adult thinking—readily perceive war for what it is.

After finding the skull, Peterkin immediately asks what it is. Kaspar tells him that it is part of the remains of a soldier who died at Blenheim. Wilhelmine then asks Kaspar to describe the war and explain its causes. Kaspar can describe what the war was like at Blenheim, but he cannot explain why the belligerents went to war. Nor does he seem curious about the causes. All that matters to him is that Austria and England won a glorious victory.

Old Kaspar unquestioningly accepts the loss of innocent women and children in the Battle of Blenheim as one of the prices of the glorious victory. His complacent attitude is not unlike that of modem politicians who dismiss the deaths of innocent civilians in arenas of war by referring to them with the impersonal phrase “collateral damage.”

Southey uses a skull, as it is the most unique part of the human body. This makes you recognise that the skull was once part of a human body that was ruthlessly killed, and again emphasises the pointlessness of war.

The poet uses repetition, as at the end each verse he repeats the ironic saying:
“But ‘it was a famous victory.”

Old Kasper continuously repeats this sentence as this is all he knows about the war and for him the deaths are a natural consequence of a war.. Although it is constantly mentioned that it was a great victory this is not what the poem is saying. Southey is using ‘ this phrase to emphasise the exact opposite, that it wasn’t a great victory.

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 3 Notes -The Bangle Sellers

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 3 Notes – The Bangle Sellers – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the Poem

The poem “Bangle Sellers” was first published in the year 1912 by Sarojini Naidu.It belongs to the third section in her collection of poems called “The Bird of Time.” The pageantry of Indian life fascinated her and she sings of it with zest. Indian customs and traditions, festivals and celebrations, men and women, fairs and feasts are abundant in her poetry. A group of bangle sellers is on its way to the temple fair to sell their bangles. One of them is the narrator of this poem. It is a poem of four stanzas , of six lines each. This poem is a perfect epitome of a typical Indian scene.

About the Poet

Sarojini Naidu was one of the renowned women poets of Indo Anglian Literature. She contributed remarkably in the arena of Indian poetry in English. Her first volume of poetry, ‘The Golden Threshold’ appeared in 1905 which made her famous at once as a poet of refined poetic sensibility. Her subsequent volumes of poems also made a mark and dealt with varied themes, such as, nature, folk life, patriotism, mysticism, love and death. Sarojini Naidu’s poems reflect her art of writing poetry which is marked by her originality of thoughts and spontaneity of expression.

Sarojini Naidu was amongst the pioneer poets of Indo-Anglian literature. She began writing poetry in the last decade of the nineteenth century but was highly influenced by the Romantic poets due to her intense reading of Romantic poetry. She started writing at the time when sonnets, ode and lyrics, having emphasis on colour, imagery, feelings and imagination were in vogue and she was highly influenced by such writings. She studied ornate poetry which made impact on her writings.

Sarojini Naidu was a gifted artist having ornamental and highly sophisticated style. Her poetry reflected that she was a superb artist in the use of words. It contained the language which burnt with feeling and passion and was as sweet as a bird’s song. Her genius like that of Shelley and Keats was essentially lyrical. She had the classicist’s perfection and refinement and the sensuousness and imagination of the Romantics. She was a conscientious artist and believed in communicating her thoughts in a language that was appealing and graceful. In striving to do so she acquired almost a distinctive style which was her own. Sri Aurobindo aptly remarked that her poetry “has qualities which make her best work exquisite, unique and unmatchable of its kind”. The poetry of Naidu reflects feminine sensibility with regard to her choice of words, passion and imagery. Armando Menezes remarked rightly: She had a woman’s love of words. They are not, to her, just convenient instruments of expression, they were things: Precious, lovely things, like jewels.

Sarojini Naidu was careful regarding the selection of words that lent grace to her  poetry’and helped her to convey her inner most feelings. We find in her poetry various aspects, relating to the use of words, which she employed to express her thoughts in charismatic tone. She possessed “unfailing verbal felicity and rhythmical dexterity”. She employed the device of alliteration, refrain, vernacular words, metaphors and striking similes to make her language effective, bearing the quality of refinement. Sarojini Naidu employed a polished diction. Her poetry reflects her command over English language. Though she was an Indian, she had mastered the foreign language which came into circulation in India due to colonialism. She had read well the English Romantic poets who influenced her to a great extent.

Naidu was conscious of the importance of language in the world of poetry and therefore she strived to have a sophisticated style by using a language which glowed with fine diction and brilliant figures of speech.

Central Idea

The central idea of the poem is that the bangles are representative of a woman’s life and each colour or type of bangle represents each stage of an Indian woman’s life, from puberty to midlife. The stages of an Indian woman’s life are represented through the colour of bangles in this poem. Each colour represents each stage she crosses. Silver and blue, or pink -maidenhood; yellow- morning of her wedding; red or orange (fiery shades) symbolises her bridal night; purple and gold- motherhood and matriarchy. Although it is only alluded to in innuendos, the patriarchal ideology lurks beneath the surface of the poem. The women are described as either happy ‘daughters’ or ‘wives’. Every phase she passes is referred to by a man in her life, father, husband, sons. The women in this poem fit into boxes that limit their existence to being a possessed object of patriarchy. Even if this poem is ironic, it still discusses the ideas propagated by the patriarchal society.

Word Meanings

  1. Rainbow tinted – Rainbow colored
  2. Lustrous – Shining
  3. Meet – Suitable
  4. Tranquil brow – Calm and quiet bank of a river, lake, pond, etc.
  5. Limpid – Clear
  6. Hue – Color.
  7. Luminous – Glowing
  8. Cleaves – stick to
  9. Flushed – become red
  10. Brow – slope
  11. Bloom – blossom
  12. Shining loads – bangles
  13. Flame of her marriage fire – red coloured
  14. Fleck – small area of particular colour
  15. Cherish – care tenderly
  16. Cradle – to hold someone gently in our arms

Paraphrase

The narrator says that we are bangle sellers who go roaming from place to place to sell their bangles. They sing their beautiful song when they go to sell their bangles in the temple fair. They invite the people to come and buy their delicate, bright and multi-coloured bangles. The bangles are tokens(symbols) of delight for happy daughters and happy wives.

In the second stanza the bangle sellers give an account of the bangles which match a maiden. The silver and blue coloured bangles are suitable for a maiden i.e an unmarried girl. These bangles are like the mist on the mountain in their colour and purity. The bangles are like buds on a woodland stream. Some are shining like flowers. All these bud-like and flower-like bangles are suitable for the unmarried girls.

In the third stanza the bangle sellers have some bangles that look like the corn fields. The bangles are suitable for a bride on her wedding morning. Some bangles look like the flame of her marriage fire.(red) Some are rich with colours of her hearts desire. They make soft sounds just like the bride makes at the time of her wedding. The bride laughs as she is getting married and weeps as she is leaving her parental home. The phrases bridal laughter and bridal tears suggest the emotional feelings of the bride.

In the last stanza the bangle sellers say that they possess certain bangles which are purple in colour and some are touched with gold and grey colours. All these bangles are suitable for a middle-aged woman whose hands have cared tenderly, loved, blessed and cradled her fair sons and worshipped the gods sitting by her husband’s side.

Summary

Bangle sellers take their load of bangles to the temple fair to sell them. The bangles are termed as “lustrous tokens of radiant lives” which mean that they are symbols of love in people’s lives. The bangles are made for happy daughters and wives. The poet says that some of the bangles are made for the unmarried women and they are of silver and blue in colour. The other bangles made for the bride glows like the fields of com during morning. Those bangles glow like the bride’s marriage flame and rich in her heart’s desires. The bangles are tinkling with ‘luminous’ colours like the bride’s laughter or tears. Some bangles are made for the elderly women who have journeyed through half of their life. These bangles are of purple colour with gold flecks. These women have served their household well, cradles their sons and have worshipped the household gods with their husbands beside them.

The tone of the poem is joyful and lively. Each stanza has a certain tone. The first recalls the city of bangle-sellers who travel on foot to sell their products. The second and third stanzas have a profound sense of happiness and lively energy. The tone of the last  stanza is dipped in pride and a sense of fulfilment.

Critical Appreciation

Naidu’s poetry is best known for her use of imagery and contemporary Indian themes. Among her other poems, this poem stands out as a social message that not only discusses the lives of Indian women but also the lives of bangle sellers. Although the poem focuses extensively on the stages in the life of women, it portrays the lives of the bangle sellers as well. Not once is the poverty or the hardship of their vocation mentioned in the poem save the ‘shining loads’, which denotes the heaviness of the bangles. The bangle seller employs a joyful voice which makes us forget that their livelihoods depend on the sale of these bangles. The women in their lives are all portrayed as happy, probably because the happiness of the bangle-seller relies upon the happiness of these women. In a nutshell, their livelihood depends on these bangles and thus, they must be presented as tokens of happiness.

The poem progresses step by step as if it is passing by each phase of the life of a woman with her. The first stanza relates to us the premise of poem. The second stanza focuses on maidenhood. By maidenhood Naidu means virginity. Thus, the colours chosen by her represent purity like the blue and silver mist of mountains, shades of pink of yet to blossom flowers or the clear dew drops on new born leaves. This has connotations to new beginnings and the promise of life. The third stanza talks about a woman who is about to become a bride. The colour chosen in this group is a lively yellow that represents the hope she has for her future and also her happiness. The imagery used here is energetic and lively like corn fields bathed in sunlight. The second part of this stanza portrays the love a new bride has for her husband. Naidu chooses the apt colour scheme of reds and oranges. The ‘flame’ Naidu talks about has sexual connotations to it. It is a euphemism for the consummation of her marriage with her husband. The fourth stanza talks about the pride of a woman who has lived girlhood and bridehood and motherhood, and earned a position as a matriarch. It is the phase in her life when her struggles have borne fruit. Therefore, this stanza has the air of royalty and pride etched in it. That is why the colours chosen to describe the bangles for a matriarch are purple and gold. The specks of grey add the touch of maturity that comes with age.

However, critics have questioned Naidu’s portrayal of women in stereotyped boxes in this poem. Her poem discusses only three categories in a woman’s life-maidenhood, wifehood and motherhood. On one hand, the poem fails to recognise other areas of a woman’s life, where women have an independent identity, one which is free from restricting labels made by a patriarchal society. Even when Naidu talks about a woman bearing children, she mentions only boys. Perhaps, the role model for this poem was a specific woman she knew. But on the other hand, she writes a poem that has strong sexual connotations. It is also probable that this is an ironic take on the lives of women during the time she was writing this poem. Naidu was instrumental in encouraging women empowerment. She encouraged women to get involved in the freedom movement against colonial rule. She herself was a big part of the movement and became the President of the INC. It could have been her way of speaking out against patriarchal constraints in  ironic terms.

Naidu uses various poetic devices. The ‘rainbow tinted circles of light’ is an instance of a metaphor. The colours of the bangles are likened to the colours of the rainbow. And the light reflected by the bangles gives it the appearance of being made of light. The ‘silver and blue as the mountain mist’ is a simile. Here, the color of the bangle is compared to the mist of the mountains. Imagery is represented by the

‘Some are aglow with the bloom that cleaves
To the limpid glory of new born leaves

This represents some of the bangles by comparing them to the transparent glory of the new bom leaves. Again she writes Some are like fields of sunlit corn, and here the comparison is made between the yellow corn fields bathed in sunlight and the yellow coloured bangles. Examples of more similes are as follows :

‘Some, like the flame of her marriage fire,
Or, rich with the hue of her heart’s desire,

the red bangles become symbolic of a new bride’s love and desire for her husband and the

‘Tinkling, luminous, tender, and clear,
Like her bridal laughter and bridal tear.

where bangles are compared to a young bride’s laughter and the luminosity of the bangles is likened to her tears. Finally Naidu brings in more vivid imagery when she writes “cradled fair sons on her breast’ where she talks of the son a middle-aged has borne and nourished and cradled close to her breast. It denotes that she has diligently performed her duties as a mother.

Finally it would be correct to say that this is a poem as much about the bangle sellers as it is about women. It talks about the mutual happiness of the two as they are interdependent. The bangles are symbolic of women and their happiness. Similarly, the. happy women can ensure the sale of more bangles, thus, becoming the symbols of happy bangle-sellers as well.

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 2 Notes -The Cold Within

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 2 Notes – The Cold Within – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the the Poem

The Cold Within” was written in the 1960s by an American poet known as James Patrick Kinney.lt has appeared in countless church bulletins, web sites and teaching seminars, as well as magazines and newspapers. According to the poet’s widow, he submitted the poem first to the Saturday Evening Post, but it was rejected as “too controversial for the time”. Kinney sent it later to Liguorian, a Catholic magazine, which was the first commercial publication to print it.

According to Timothy Kinney (the poet’s son), the poem was originally read at an ecumenical council meeting, after which the ministers, priests and rabbis in attendance requested copies of it. They read the poem to their congregations and, before long, “The Cold Within” became well known throughout the United States. According to James Patrick Kinney’s son, the poem is in the public domain. A short and sweet poem written by James Patrick Kinney in the 60’s that gives an extreme euphemism for the consequences of racism.

About the Poet

The late James P. Kinney fueled by a sense of justice, and wanted to change the world for the better. With this motive in mind he wrote his most famous poem, “The Cold Within ”, which is a simple, straightforward and powerful poem. It also describes the man who wrote it. When you understand the man, you’ll see why he wrote the poem. Thanks to Timothy Kinney, James Kinney’s son, we have insight into the man behind this now- classic poem:

The poet talks about Cheviot, Ohio, which is a township on the west side of Cincinnati,Ohio. There was still a law on the books there that a black person was not allowed on the streets of the city after dark. This was during the civil rights movement. The poet and a group of men from his church felt that this was an outrage, so they approached the City Council to have the law abolished. They were told that, since there were no black families in Cheviot, any black person on the streets after dark was obviously up to no good, so the law would remain. My father’s group found a family of black activists who were willing to move to Cheviot. They helped them move in and tried to make them feel at home. Then they approached the City Council again and said “under the new circumstances, the law must be changed.”

The City Council changed the law, but they were not very happy about it. The poet I    was really unhappy with the community and the way they reacted to the change, so he pulled out and shared with the community a poem he had written during the early years .of the civil right movement; it was “The Cold Within”, a parable about the things that separate us and how the coldness in men’s hearts is a kind of death. The message was  so powerful, the poem took on a life of its own. The poem beautifully captured the futility and stupidity of racism and bigotry. Helping out someone you hate can be one of the hardest things that you have to face, and when you are put in that situation what would you do? Could you be brave enough to save someone you despise in order to save yourself? In “The Cold Within”, James Patrick Kinney uses diction, figurative language,and rhyme to project his point that prejudices controlling people’s lives and actions.

     Central Idea

The Cold within refers to the lack of feelings for or hatred of , others which is a unforgivable sin. Many of us fall a prey to this coldness or hatred within our hearts due to racial discrimination or hatred and this leads to our doom. This prejudice may result due to race, colour, creed, caste or region. It changes our thinking and corrupts us making us mean, cruel, greedy or unkind. Six men in the poem had a stick each and could have kept the fire going by relinquishing their sticks and all would have been saved. But the frigidity of their hearts prevented them from saving the others. This is the major theme that the colness in men’s heart is a kind of death.

Word Meanings

  1. Trapped – caught in a difficult and inescapable situation.
  2. Happenstance – chance, here refers to an event which seems to be pre-arranged and not accidental.
  3. Stick of wood – small log of wood.
  4. Back – did not give up.
  5. Black – of African origin.
  6. Not of his church – person of different religion.
  7. Bring himself to give – force himself to give something
  8. Tattered clothes – rags.
  9. Gave his coat a hitch – tightened his coat, symbolic of his meanness.
  10. Idle rich – the rich who do not work hard but thrive on the labour of the poor.
  11. Lazy – who shirks work.
  12. Shiftless – without ambition to succeed in life.
  13. Bespoke – showed.
  14. Spite – hatred.
  15. Forlorn – lonely.
  16. Nought – nothing
  17. Gain – profit.
  18. Cold without – cold weather outside.
  19. Cold within – lack of human feelings like kindness, generosity, selflessness, etc.

Paraphrase

Six people were trapped in the cold and it was dark. Each possessed one stick of wood, and their fire was dying. This is how the story is told.

The first man saw a black man in the group and did not want to give his stick because it would save the black man’s life.

The second who had a birch stick, didn’t want to help the other-religion person who did not belong to his church.

The third man didn’t want to use his little stick to warm the rich; he was very poor and so hated the rich.

The fourth man was rich and wanted to keep his great amount of money away from the undeserving, lazy poor people. The fifth man-a black wanted revenge from the white people- he wanted to hurt the white people somehow, so he kept his stick

The sixth man didn’t receive any help from the others since none of them gave up their stick, so he wouldn’t either since they didn’t.

They all kept their sticks,tightly clutched in their hands and this was a proof of their human sin of hate and racism. As a result they all died but it was not the cold outside which killed them but the cold and hate in their hearts for each other that killed them.

Summary

The people in this poem illustrate the coldness within and how destructive it is and how it works. The poem as a whole is about the need for human beings to tolerate one another. It speaks of how hatred of other people because of their race or religion or some other characteristic ends up hurting all people. We are introduced to the basic setting – ^ – there are six people around a fire, each with a stick of wood. The second stanza shows us the first instance of bigotry. One of the people notices that another of the six is black. He did not put his log in the fire because he did not want to help a black person. The second man is a bigot and does not want to help the man who was not from his religion. The poor man did not want to help the idle rich and the rich did not want to share with the poor. The black wanted to take revenge from the white and the consequence of all this feelings of hate, revenge and religious bigotry was that none of them gave his stick to keep the fire going. Thus the fire died and they too died of the cold, each a prisoner of the hate within, the coldness of their hearts which killed all of them. Having a log still in their hand shows that they kept it back (sinning, being unkind). The cold outside did not kill them (for if they gave up their sticks, they would all live), the cold sins in their minds led to their death.

Critical Appreciation

‘A Cold Within’ is a short and sweet poem written by James Patrick Kinney in the 60’s that gives an extreme euphemism for the consequences of racism The poem is a parable- that is a story with a moral. It is so because the pet is trying to bring home a very important lesson to his readers. The six men die not because of the cold weather but because of the cold within-the hatred, racism, prejudice, revenge and arrogance. In the beginning, the poem unwraps as a story or a tale. The author uses negative language   ‘idle,’ ‘lazy’, ‘shiftless’. The people in this poem illustrate the coldness within and how destructive it is and how it works. These six people have a fire keeping them all alive. If even one would have relinquished his stick to feed the dying flame, then they would ; have all survived. However, each of them was held back by a sin:

1st: prejudice – He didn’t want to save the black man
2nd: intolerance – He did not want support one of another religion
3rd: bitterness and envy – He felt that it would be unjust for her, a poor person, to give ; what little he had to warm the others who had more than she.
4th: greed, stinginess – He felt that he earned what he got and that the poor were poor because they were lazy, thus meaning he shouldn’t give anything to help the undeserving (in his opinion).
5th: …spite, – The black man knew that he could save the white people, but he didn’t,feeling vindicated.
6th: lack of generosity – He would only give to those who gave first.

The line that Kinney starts his poem with is “six humans trapped by happenstance”. His diction in this line is very important to the overall theme of the poem. By saying “six  humans”, it is almost as if he is talking about all humans. If he would have said “people” then we might have different associations with the words. Another curious use of diction is by saying “trapped in happenstance”. Happenstance means an event that might have been arranged although it is accidental. This use of diction is important because by saying that it is accidental, yet almost seems arranged, gives the reader a sense that they are supposed to be there. The fact that he says they are trapped suggests that they do not  want to be in the situation, but they cannot escape.

Figurative language plays a vital role in developing the poems theme. “Their dying fire in need of logs” literally means the fire that is keeping them warm, but also stands as a metaphor for their sinful souls. They are committing sins such as racism, envy, arrogance, revenge, and greed. By saying they need to add logs to the fire suggest that they need to help out someone other than themselves, or they will “freeze” to death. Opening up and not being greedy will warm their souls and will save them, unfortunately it has overcome them and is an impossibility.

The poet uses various literary devices. Symbols are used extensively. Each log of wood is suggestive of a sin. If the logs of wood are put into the fire it would mean helping out someone , other than one’s own self. But if they are held on as they are, it means holding onto sins even beyond death. Each man’s prejudice- greed, envy, arrogance, revenge, spite, intolerance – are represented symbolically by the stick held by each man. The cold within is a metaphor for lack of warm – heartedness, selfishness, hard-heartedness and inability to reach out to others.

The rhyme of the poems sets up an easy read. Each stanza having four lines has the rhyme scheme of abcb. This allows for your eyes to simply glide and take in Kinney’s message: the frigidity of people is what ends up killing them. The rhythm is important to the theme of the story because it makes reading the poem faster. This is important because this indirectly shows how fast arrogance, greed, and sin can “kill” anyone.

The poet effectively portrays his point about hatred killing by using diction, figurative language, and rhyme. His persuasion in this poem is really helpful in understanding the entirety behind his point. This poem really makes you think about yourself and the lengths to which you would go to either hurt someone else, or save yourself. His tone seems condemning, scornful. Also, it seems to be warning you somewhat about the results of a cold heart.

Thus it was not the cold which led to their death but the cold of hate and racism and bitterness which killed all of them. The poet emphasises the idea that it is the coldness within men’s hearts which leads to their death and doom.

For More Resources

 

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 1 Notes – The Heart of a Tree

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 1 Notes – The Heart of a Tree – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

About the Poet

Henry Cuyler Bunner was born in Oswego, New York to Rudolph Bunner, Jr. (1813­1875) and Ruth Keating Tuckerman (1821-1896) and was educated in New York City.

From being a clerk in an importing house, he turned to journalism, and after working as a reporter, and on the staff of The Arcadian (1873), he became in 1877 an assistant editor of the comic weekly Puck. He soon assumed the editorship, which he held until his death. He developed Puck from a new struggling periodical into a powerful social and political organ. In 1886, he published a novel, The Midge, followed in 1887 by The Story of a New York House. But his best efforts in fiction were his short stories and sketches Short Sixes (1891), More Short Sixes (1894), Made in France (1893), Zadoc Pine and Other Stories (1891), Love in Old Clothes and Other Stories (1896), and Jersey Street and Jersey Lane (1896). His verses Airs from A ready and Elsewhere (1884), containing the well-known poem, The Way to Arcady; Rowen (1892); and Poems (1896), displaying a light play of imagination and a delicate workmanship. He also wrote clever parodies.

Bunner married Alice Learned (1863-1952), daughter of Joshua Coit Learned (1819— 1892), and granddaughter of Joshua Coit (1758-1798), U.S. Representative from Connecticut. Bunner died on May 11, 1896 in Nutley, New Jersey.

The position which Henry Cuyler Bunner has come to occupy in the literary annals of our time strengthens as the days pass. If the stream of his genius flowed in gentle rivulets, it traveled as far and spread its fruitful influence as wide as many a statelier river. He was above all things a poet. In his prose as in his verse he has revealed the essential qualities of a poet’s nature: he dealt with the life which he saw about him in a spirit of broad humanity and with genial sympathy.

The work upon which Bunner’s fame must rest was all produced within a period of less than fifteen years. He was born in 1855 at Oswego, New York. He came to the city of New York when very young, and received his education there. A brief experience of business life sufficed to make his true vocation clear, and at the age of eighteen he began his literary apprenticeship on the Arcadian. When that periodical passed away, Puck was just struggling into existence, and for the English edition, which was started in 1877, Bunner’s services were secured. Half of his short life was spent in editorial connection with that paper. To his wisdom and literary abilities is due in large measure the success which has always attended the enterprise. Bunner had an intimate knowledge of American character and understood the foibles of his countrymen; but he was never cynical, and his satire was without hostility. He despised opportune journalism. His editorials were clear and vigorous; free not from partisanship, but from partisan rancor, and they made for honesty and independence. His firm stand against political corruption, socialistic vagaries, the misguided and often criminal efforts of labor agitators, and all the visionary schemes of diseased minds, has contributed to the stability of sound and self-respecting American citizenship.

About the Poem

It is a poem which shows the poets affinity with nature. The Heart of the Tree also subtitled as an Arbor-day Song and was written in April 1893. It is a comment on the benefits of planting a tree. Divided into three stanzas the poem tells us about the various benefits of planting a tree. Each stanza opens with the same question: What does he plant who plants a tree? The poet then provides answers himself. He who plants a tree, plants many things: the gentle sunshine, cool, free breezes, beauty, music and harmony. He ensures cool shade and tender rain. The one who plants a tree is conscious about the well being and growth of his country and in fact leaves a invaluable legacy for future generations. The poet tells us that trees are a boon for our environment and are symbolic of innumerable things . He motivates us to plant trees.

Central Idea

Heart of Trees relates to the cycle of life that is very evident in the growth of a tree, which germinates in soil, grows and flourishes, then dies, decays and returns to the soil to support new saplings. Transformation is the central concept and reveals interest in the way that something exceptional can be produced from a simple beginning, that base matter can give life to something infinitely more elaborate. This relationship mirrors the pairing of body and soul, the body being material and limited in scope, and the soul being immaterial and boundless. As the tree grows we can imagine that it may either break the shackles of the body that surrounds it, or be smothered by it; a conflict that represents the relationship between body and soul.

The poem highlights the need to plant trees as it benefits all and sundry. A tree not only provides shade and cool breeze but it also is a legacy for future generations and binds the present to the future. It represents values like love and loyalty. One who plants trees not only ensures the development of his nation but also the peace and prosperity of the world. Thus, the poet tells us that planting a tree has ecological, social and economic advantages. In fact a tree according to him is a metaphor for peace, growth, beauty, harmony and prosperity.

Word Meanings

  1. Shaft – a ray of light or bolt of lightning, body of a spear or arrow, or similar.
  2. Towering – extremely tall, especially in comparison with the surroundings.
  3. Anigh – (archaic) near, close
  4. Croon – hum or sing in a soft, low voice, especially in a sentimental manner.
  5. Hushed – (of a voice or conversation) quiet and serious.
  6. Twilight – the soft glowing light from the sky when the sun is below the horizon, caused by the reflection of the sun’s rays from the atmosphere, ambiguity, or gradual decline.
  7. Treble – consisting of three parts; threefold.
  8. Days to be – days to come,future.
  9. Harmony – the combination of simultaneously sounded musical notes to produce a pleasing effect.
  10. Flush – (of a person’s skin, face, etc.) become red and hot, typically as the result of illness or strong emotion.
  11. Heritage – property that is or may be inherited; an inheritance.
  12. Harvest – reward
  13. Coming age – Coming of age is a young person’s transition from being a child to being an adult. The certain age at which this transition takes place changes in society, as does the nature of the change. … It can be a simple legal convention or can be part of a ritual or spiritual event, as practiced by many societies.
  14. Unborn eyes – unborn children
  15. Sap – the fluid which circulates in the vascular system of a plant, consisting chiefly of water with dissolved sugars and mineral salts.
  16. Far-cast – wide
  17. Civic – relating to a city or town, especially its administration; municipal.
  18. From sea to sea – all the world
  19. Stirs – moves, arouses a feeling.

Paraphrase

Stanza 1
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 1 Notes - The Heart of a Tree 1

Paraphrase

When a man plants a tree he plants many things. He plants a congenial environment. A tree reduces temperature Wand purifies the atmosphere as it traps dust , pollen and smoke. It ensures cool and gentle breezes. Thus it is truly, ‘a friend of sun and sky.’ It makes a heaven on earth as a green place is truly a heaven. One who plants a tree provides safe haven for birds whose sweet crooning in silent and happy twilight delights us. One who plants a tree ensures peace, harmony and comfort for himself and others.

Stanza 2
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 1 Notes - The Heart of a Tree 2

Paraphrase

What does he plant who plants a tree? A simple answer. One who plants a tree provides cool shade in summer and tender rain in all seasons which are essential for existence of life on this planet. A tree gives us seeds which sprout, and buds which bloom in times to come. It is a forest heritage as one tree leads to a whole forest in the future and a’ harvest of a coming age or in other words a reward and legacy for the future in the form of wood and a congenial environment. It provides benefits in the present and in the times to come. In fact it provides a link between us and our future generations.

Stanza 3
Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Poems Workbook Answers Chapter 1 Notes - The Heart of a Tree 3

Paraphrase

When a tree is planted many benefits accrue. Values like love and loyalty are planted in the form of a tree. We learn to nurture and grow with love. The there is a civic good in planting a tree. It benefits the neighbours around. A county’s growth and development depends on the wealth of its trees. One who plants a tree is aware about this fact as a ‘nation’s growth from sea to sea Stirs in his heart who plants a tree.’ Thus the world prosperity and peace is represented in the planting of a tree.

Summary

The poet emphasises the advantages of planting a tree. In every stanza he poses the question, ‘What does he plant who plants a tree?’ And the answer he simply provides is that the one who plants a tree ensures cool shade and tender rain in summer. The planting of a tree makes the atmosphere fresh and pollution free giving peace and comfort not only to the one who plants a tree but to all and sundry.

The poet the repeats his question and answers that one who plants a tree provides cool shade in summer and tender rain in all seasons which are essential for existence of life on this planet. A tree gives us seeds which sprout, and buds which bloom in times to come. It is a forest heritage as one tree leads to a whole forest in the future and a’ harvest of a coming age or in other words a reward and legacy for the future in the form of wood and a congenial environment. It is a link of the present to the future.

Finally the poet says that Values like love and loyalty are planted in the form of a tree. We learn to nurture and grow with love. The there is a civic good in planting a tree. It benefits the neighbours around. A county’s growth and development depends on the wealth of its trees. Thus the poet feels that the planting of a tree leads to social, ecological and economic growth and prosperity and is a metaphor for peace, harmony, growth and pollution free environment.

Critical Appreciation

The message is that a tree is more symbolic than meets the eye. It is a heart, and whenever a heart is planted it will sprout into beaming life, and will create new life! Trees are a fundamental image for alchemists. The roots are in dead matter, minerals, earth, and they are able to create life. The trunk is like a bridge; and the branches are a link to the cosmos. The philosophical tree was represented as growing out of a man’s sex and a woman’s head. Alchemists claimed that when humans died, dead matter gave birth to a new life. The tree was a metaphor for transformation.

The poet uses similes and metaphors to describe what a tree. He uses literary devices like metaphors, alliteration and imagery in the poem. The poet describes the tree metaphorically: ‘a friend of sun and sky,’ ‘the flag of breezes free.’

He uses alliteration when he says: He plants a friend of sun and sky.
In hushed and happy twilight heard’
Visual Imagery is used in the poem: The shaft of beauty, towering high:, ‘ the flag of breezes free. ’ And auditory imagery is also used : ‘For song and mother-croon of bird.”

Repetition is used to show how a person should feel after he/she plants a tree. The first line of the poem, “What does he plant who plants a tree?” is repeated three times, and is followed by, “These things he plants who plants a tree,” which is repeated twice, and on the last line it says, “A nation’s growth from sea to sea (new line) Stirs in his heart who plants a tree.” All put together it tells you that this man thinks that planting a tree is like planting a new nation and it will bring peace and harmony to the Earth!

The tone of the poem is rhetorical and motivating. The rhyme scheme is ababbccda, ababbccaa, ababbccaa.The poem is in the form of a short lyric consisting of three stanzas. It creates good rhythm and music and like a good lyric incorporates only a single emotion and appeals to our hearts at once.

Though the poem was written many years ago when there was little importance given to ecology and environment yet it is relevant today also because it tells us that trees are an integral and important part of our ecological and economic growth and environmental well -being. In our times forests are being decimated for building houses, roads and bridges. Trees seem to attract none of our concern. But in the poem the poet draws our attention to the advantages of planting trees. He rightly says that one who plants trees, plants many things: beauty, peace, shade, harmony and good values.

The tree is used as a symbol of all the good in our lives. It symbolises peace and prosperity in our country and in the world. It teaches the vales of love and loyalty. It symbolises rich rewards for our future generations and represents a link of our present with the future. It stands as a symbol of growth, prosperity and harmony.

The title of the poem is very apt and suggestive. The tree is the main focus in the poem and the poet refers to the heart of the tree. What kind of heart is it- it is generous, loving and magnanimous. It shows no discrimination based on colour or creed. It blesses all alike- all who take care of it and even those who neglect it. Whenever a tree is planted it turns the earth into a heaven and the poet rightly says:

The shaft of beauty, towering high:
He plants a home to heaven anigh.
Thus the poet in his lyrical poem motivates us to plant trees for our own and the world’s development and harmony.

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 10 All Summer in a Day 

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 10 All Summer in a Day – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

Comprehension Passages

Passage 1

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

“Do the scientists really know? Will it happen today, will it ?”
“Look, look; see for yourself !”The children pressed to each other like so many  roses, so many weeds, intermixed, peering out for a look at the hidden sun. It rained. It had been raining for seven years; thousands upon thousands of days compounded and filled from one end to the other with rain, with the drum and gush of water, with the sweet crystal fall of showers and the concussion of storms so heavy they were tidal waves come over the islands. A thousand forests had been crushed under the rain and grown up a thousand times to be crushed again. And this was the way life was forever on the planet Venus, and this was the schoolroom of the children of the rocket men and women who had come to a raining world to set up civilization and live out their lives.

Question 1.
Which is the place under discussion?
Answer:
The place under discussion is the planet Venus and the weather there.

Question 2.
What is the weather like on Venus? How long has it been like this?
Answer:
The weather is dark and depressing as there is no sun for the past seven years. It had been raining for seven years; thousands upon thousands of days compounded and filled from one end to the other with rain.

Question 3.
What is supposed to happen on this particular day?
Answer:
The scientists had predicted that on that particular day the sun would shine for a short while.

Question 4.
Describe the rain and its effect on life on Venus.
Answer:
The sun remains hidden for seven years on Venus and it rains continuously for those seven years, thousands upon thousands of days compounded and filled from one end to the other with rain, with the drum and gush of water, with the sweet crystal fall of showers and the concussion of storms so heavy they were tidal waves come over the islands. A thousand forests had been crushed under the rain and grown up a thousand times to be crushed again.

Question 5.
Why had the rocket men and women come to Venus?
Answer:
The rocket men and women had come to the raining world of Venus to set up a civilization and live out their lives.

Passage 2

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Margot stood apart from these children who could never remember a time when there wasn’t rain and rain and rain. They were all nine years old, and if there had been a day, seven years ago, when the sun came out for an hour and showed its face to the stunned world, they could not recall. Sometimes, at night, she heard them stir, in remembrance, and she knew they were dreaming and remembering an old or a yellow crayon or a coin large enough to buy the world with. She knew they thought they remembered a warmness, like a blushing in the face, in the body, in the arms and legs and trembling hands. But then they always awoke to the tatting drum, the endless shaking down of clear bead necklaces upon the roof, the walk, the gardens, the forests, and their dreams were gone. All day yesterday they had read in class about the sun. About how like a lemon it was, and how hot. And they had written small stories or essays or poems about it:

I think the snn is a flower,
That blooms for just one hour.

Question 1.
Why are the other children unable to remember the sun?
Answer:
The other children were unable to remember the sun because in case there had been a day seven years ago when the sun had shone for a short while, they would not be able to recall as they would have been only two years old.

Question 2.
What memory disturbed the children at night sometimes?
Answer:
The vague memory of the sun troubled them and they mistook it for an old yellow crayon or a coin large enough to buy the world with.

Question 3.
What were the things the children were familiar with in their world?
Answer:
The children were familiar with the tatting drum, the endless shaking down of clear bead necklaces upon the roof, the walk, the gardens, and the forests.

Question 4.
What did the children read in class all day long?
Answer:
All day they had read in class about the sun. About how it resembled a lemon, and how hot was the sun. The children had also written small stories or essays or poems about the sun.

Question 5.
What had Margot written about the sun in her poem?
Answer:
She had written that the sun was like a flower that bloomed only for an hour.

Passage 3

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Margot stood alone. She was a very frail girl who looked as if she had been lost in the rain for years and the rain had washed out the blue from her eyes and the red from her mouth and the yellow from her hair. She was an old photograph dusted from an album, whitened away, and if she spoke at all her voice would be a ghost. Now she stood, separate, staring at the rain and the loud wet world beyond the huge glass. “What’re you looking at ?” said William. Margot said nothing. “Speak when you’re spoken to.” He gave her a shove. But she did not move; rather she let herself be moved only by him and nothing else. They edged away from her, they would not look at her. She felt them go away. And this was because she would play no games with them in the echoing tunnels of the underground city. If they tagged her and ran, she stood blinking after them and did not follow. When the class sang songs about happiness and life and games her lips barely moved. Only when they sang about the sun and the summer did her lips move as she watched the drenched windows.

Question 1.
What did Margot look like?
Answer:
Margot was a thin and delicate girl who looked as if she had been lost in the rain for years and the rain had washed out the blue from her eyes and the red from her mouth and the yellow from her hair. She was an old photograph dusted from an album, whitened away.

Question 2.
Why was Margot sad?
Answer:
Margot was sad because she did not like the rain and she remembered the warmth and brightness of the sun on Earth where it could be seen every day.

Question 3.
What was the reaction of the children towards Margot?
Answer:
The children found Margot strange and bullied her. They edged away from her, they would not look at her.

Question 4.
Why did they behave in this manner towards Margot?
Answer:
The children behaved in this manner towards Margot because she would not play games with them in the echoing tunnels of the underground city. If they tagged her and ran, she stood blinking after them and did not follow. When the class sang songs about happiness and life and games her lips barely moved.

Question 5.
When did Margot react ?
Answer:
Margot reacted only when they sang about the sun and the summer. Then her lips moved as she watched the drenched windows. Even the mention of the sun made her happy and react in some manner.

Passage 4

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

So after that, dimly, dimly, she sensed it, she was different and they knew her difference and kept away. There was talk that her father and mother were taking her back to Earth next year; it seemed vital to her that they do so, though it would mean the loss of thousands of dollars to her family. And so, the children hated her for all these reasons of big and little consequence. They hated her pale snow face, her waiting silence, her thinness, and her possible future. “Get away 1” The boy gave her another push. “What’re you waiting for?”Then, for the first time, she turned and looked at him. And what she was waiting for was in her eyes. “Well, don’t wait around here !” cried the boy savagely. “You won’t see nothing!” Her lips moved. “Nothing 1” he cried. “It was all a joke, wasn’t it?” He turned to the other children. “Nothing’s happening today. Is it ?”

Question 1.
What makes Margot different from the other children? Why?
Answer:
Margot had memories of the sun and the glorious effect and warmth of the sun. But the children had no recollections and remembered only the colourless and depressing rain on Venus. This was the main difference.

Question 2.
What was the rumour? What did Margot think?
Answer:
There was a rumour that Margot’s parents were taking her back to Earth next year. It seemed important to Margot that they do so because she hated Venus and could not survive without the Sun on Venus. The decision to take Margot back to Earth would mean loss of thousands of dollars to her family.

Question 3.
Why did the children hate her?
Answer:
The children sensed that Margot was different from them. She hated the continuous rain while they were used to it. She spoke only about the sun and they had no memory of it. They hated her pale snow face, her waiting silence, her thinness, and her possible future of going back to the Earth.

Question 4.
What is the ‘it’ referred to by William?
Answer:
The ‘it’ referred to by William is the Sun which the scientists had predicted would shine for a short while that day.

Question 5.
What was Margot waiting for? Why did William say it was a joke?
Answer:
Margot was waiting to see the sun predicted to shine that day for a short while. William did not want her to have the joy of seeing the sun .

Passage 5

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

They stood in the doorway of the underground for a moment until it was raining hard. Then they closed the door and heard the gigantic sound of the rain falling in tons and avalanches, everywhere and forever.

“Will it be seven more years?” “Yes. Seven.” Then one of them gave a little cry. “Margot!” “What?” “She’s still in the closet where we locked her.” “Margot.”

They stood as if someone had driven them, like so many stakes, into the floor. They looked at each other and then looked away. They glanced out at the world that was raining now and raining and raining steadily. They could not meet each other’s glances. Their faces were solemn and pale. They looked at their hands and feet, their faces down. “Margot.” One of the girls said, “Well.. .?” No one moved. “Go on,” whispered the girl. They walked slowly down the hall in the sound of the cold rain. They turned through the doorway to the room in the sound of the storm and thunder, lightning on their faces, blue and terrible. They walked over to the closet door slowly and stood by it. Behind the closed door was only silence. They unlocked the door, even more slowly, and let Margot out.

Question 1.
When would the Sun shine again? Why had the children locked Margot in the closet?
Answer:
The sun would shine after seven years. The children knew Margot loved the sun and had waited to see it. But they hated her and so did not want her to see the sun and locked her in the closet.

Question 2.
Why were the children avoiding looking at each other?
Answer:
The children glanced out at the world that was raining now and raining and raining steadily. They could not meet each other’s glances. Their faces were solemn and pale. They looked at their hands and feet, their faces down because they were guilty of hurting Margot by not letting her see the Sun. Now it would shine on Venus only after seven years. They had been cruel to Margot.

Question 3.
Why does the author describe their faces as blue and terrible?
Answer:
The author describes their faces as blue and terrible to accentuate their criminal and mean minds which are the result of living on Venus, away from the positive energy of the Sun.

Question 4.
What impression does one get of the life of people away from the Sun ?
Answer:
The power of the sun over the children living on Venus is notable. They are pale and colourless, not just physically but also emotionally. The lack of the sun has not only washed away the colour on their skin but also their compassion and empathy for other people. They do not gain this until they’ve spent time under the sun’s rays. The sun is life giving for the landscape as well as the inhabitants of Venus.

Assignment

Question 1.
How does Ray Bradbury develop the mood in “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
Bradbury uses lyrical language to convey a mood of longing and loss in this story of a Venus where the sun only emerges once every seven years. This mood is reinforced by the personality of the main character, Margot, a sensitive, melancholy little girl whose soul’s sadness seems reflected in the ever present rain. The sun in this story becomes the metaphor for all our longings and desires.

Bradbury doesn’t just say it rained all the time, but describes the rain: “the sweet crystal fall of showers and the concussion of storms so heavy … A thousand forests had been crushed.” Likewise, Bradbury lingers over descriptions of the sun. It is like “gold” or a “lemon crayon,” “flaming bronze” and a “warm iron.”

Bradbury repeatedly uses similes and poetic language to describe this sun and this world. Rather than hurtle us forward from event to event in this stoiy, Bradbury encourages us, through his description, to stop and to experience being drenched in what it is like to be on this imaginary Venus. Only two things happen in terms of plot: the sun comes out and Margot, who longs so deeply to see it, is locked away in a closet by the other children. The rest is the longing mood Bradbury evokes.

Question 2.
What is the theme of all summer in a day by Ray Bradbury?
Answer:
The theme for “All Summer in a Day” is bullying and jealousy. Kids, and people alike, can be so mean when they are confronted with someone different than their current understanding or when they are jealous. Margot had known what the sun looked, and felt like when she lived on Earth; but, the children of Venus who get to see the sun for two hours once every seven years could not relate to her experience. The children wouldn’t have locked Margot in the closet at that very special moment when the sun comes out if it had not have been for William. William is the antagonist who suggests that they lock her up because,the biggest crime of all was that she had come here only five years ago from Earth, and she remembered the sun and the way the sun was and the sky was when she was four in Ohio. And they, they had been on Venus all their lives, and they had been only two years old when last the sun came out and had long since forgotten the color and heat of it and the way it really was. But Margot remembered.”

Here we see that motive behind the rage and jealousy that the children felt for Margot. Whether it is one situation or another, Bradbury brings out a true principle of the human condition with this story; and that is the effects that jealousy can have when acted upon.

Question 3.
What are examples of simile, metaphor, and personification in “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
Ray Bradbury’s short story “All Summer in a Day” has many different types of figures  of speech. Similes compare two unlike things using the words “like” or “as.” Metaphors compare two unlike things using words like “is” or “was.” Finally, personification occurs when an animal or inanimate object is given human traits or qualities. These figures of speech not only help to communicate what the author wants to portray in the story, but also helps readers to connect with something they may have already understood, which then creates more meaning for them in the story. For example, the following is a passage that demonstrates the use of simile and metaphor:

‘All day yesterday they had read in class about the sun. About how like a lemon it was, and how hot.          And they had written small stories or essays or poems about it:
I think the sun is a flower,
That blooms for just one hour.’
The first figure of speech is a simile because it compares the sun to a lemon using the word “like.” Then, a metaphor is used when the sun is compared to a flower using the word “is.”
The next passage has examples of two similes:
‘But Margot remembered.
“It’s like a penny,” she said once, eyes closed.
“No it’s not!” the children cried.
“It’s like a fire,” she said, “in the stove.”
Both figures of speech in this passage are similes because the sun is compared to a penny and then to fire using the word “like.” The next example demonstrates how personification is used in the story:

‘They stood looking at the door and saw it tremble from her beating and throwing herself against it.’

In animate objects do not have the ability to tremble like people do; therefore, this is an example of personification. The door “trembles” because it receives the impact of Margot’s protest and anxiety about being trapped. It also seems as though Bradbury uses personification when Margot is locked in the closet to describe how her emotions powerfully transfer through the door as she pounds on it.

Question 4.
What is the central conflict of the story “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
The central conflict of the story is that Margot does not fit in with the other children.

The basic situation is that it has been raining on Venus for seven years. The children, who are nine years old, do not remember ever seeing the sun. The sun is scheduled to come out, so the kids are very excited. Margot is excited too, but she is a child who just doesn’t fit in.

Margot is from Earth, and the other children are from Venus. In addition to that, Margot is delicate and sensitive and just doesn’t associate with the other kids.

They turned on themselves, like a feverish wheel, all tumbling spokes. Margot stood * alone. She was a veiy frail girl who looked as if she had been lost in the rain for years and the rain had washed out the blue from her eyes and the red from her mouth and the yellow from her hair.

The other kids tease Margot and don’t understand her. They are envious of her, and like many kids they turn that envy to cruelty. When the class is preparing for the sun to come out, the children tease Margot for the poem she wrote. She remembers the sun, and that really eats at them.

When the teacher leaves the room just as the sun is about to come out, the conflict comes to a head.
“Get away !” The boy gave her another push. “What’re you waiting for?”

Then, for the first time, she turned and looked at him. And what she was waiting for was in her eyes.

The boy tells Margot it was all a joke, and suggests they lock her in the closet. He is using her desperation and expectation against her, even though all of the children want the same thing. They are all ramped up, and need a target for their energy and aggression. Margot is an easy target.

Question 5.
What is the climax of Ray Bradbury’s “All Summer in a Day?”
Answer:
The climax of Bradbury’s short story is when the sun comes out for the first time in seven years. The kids have locked Margot in a closet and to their astonishment, the sun comes out. They bolt outside to the sun, frolicking and playing in the illumination. They play until it begins to rain and then they have to come back inside. It becomes evident to them, in a dawning- like realization, that they left Margot in the closet.

This moment of the sun appearing is the climax because it is the point in which the action is the greatest. In the conflict between Margot and the group of students, it is at this point where the tension between both is the highest in an almost contradictory moment of unity and symmetry. It is Bradbury’s genius to construct the situation so that Margot was actually right. Rather than praise her for her correct world view, the kids flock towards her absolute sense of accuracy and her vision, something that she is not able to appreciate because of being marginalized. The height of the plot, the moment where the action is most intense, is in this moment of unity, one in which there is validation but not for the person who advocated it. In this, there is a climax and a sense of diminishing action appears at the end when the children come to the silent realization that they have to release Margot out of the closet.

Question 6.
What is the setting of “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
The story is set in Venus sometime in the future on a day when the rain stops briefly.

A group of children are living on Venus. It rains every day for seven years. The children have not seen the sun in all that time. The children are nine years old, and have not seen the sun since it came out seven years before for an hour.

And this was the way life was forever on the planet Venus, and this was the schoolroom of the children of the rocket men and women who had come to a raining world to set up civilization and live out their lives.

A girl named Margot came from Earth, and remembers the sun. The other children are angry because she has seen it and they haven’t. On the one day the sun comes out they decide to lock her in a closet, and she misses the few minutes of sun.

The story demonstrates that children are children, no matter the setting. The children are cruel to Margot because she is different, and because they are jealous. Due to their actions, she misses seeing the sun. Only then do the children regret what they have done.

Question 7.
What does “I think the sun is a flower” mean in Ray Bradbury’s short story “All Summer in a Day”?           Answer:
In Ray Bradbury’s short story “All Summer in a Day,” the metaphor “ think the sun is a flower” was written in a poem about the sun by the protagonist Margo. In her poem, Margo aimed to describe the glow of the sun as a blooming flower. Though she doesn’t specify what kind of flower, the reader might visualize a round golden daisy or poppy. The image of the flower helps capture the round, yellow image of the sun.

In addition, Margo’s metaphor parallels with the other children’s experience in seeing the sun for the first time. As they look outside as the sun comes out, they see the “great jungle that covered Venus” transform. Suddenly, because of the sunshine, the jungle looks alive, flowing, and full of color, similar to a flower, as we see in the narrator’s following description:

It was a nest of octopi, clustering up great arms of fleshlike weed, wavering, flowering in this brief spring.

Hence, as we can see, Margo’s metaphor serves the purpose of likening the sun to a flower to capture the sun’s color, shape, and glowing warmth. Margo’s description of the sun parallels with the effect the sun has on nature found on Venus.

Question 8.
Why was Margot unhappy on Venus in “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
Margot is unhappy on Venus because she came from Earth and misses the sun. The story takes place on Venus, a planet where it rains almost all of the time. In fact, the sun has not come out in seven years. Margot, however, came from Earth five years before the story starts. That means that unlike the other children in her class, she remembers what the sun looks like. She misses it terribly.

[She] sensed it, she was different and they knew her difference and kept away. There was talk that her father and mother were taking her back to Earth next year; it seemed vital to her that they do so, though it would mean the loss of thousands of dollars to her family.

Margot does not get along with the other children. She doesn’t play their games, and they are jealous of her for having recently been to Earth and for having the chance to go back. For this reason, the children bully Margot and she isolates herself. She doesn’t seem to make any friends.

On the day the sun is supposed to finally come out, the children decide to play a cruel trick on Margot. They tell her the scientists were wrong, and then lock her in a closet so that-when it does come out, she won’t see it. She is horrified.

They surged about her, caught her up and bore her, protesting, and then pleading, and then ciying, back into a tunnel, a room, a closet, where they slammed and locked the door. They stood looking at the door and saw it tremble from her beating and throwing herself against it.

Although the children are cruel bullies, the trick they played was terrible. Margot is very sensitive and this will likely have a great effect on her. They know this, and seem just as horrified when they realize what they have done. After the sun leaves, they go to take her out again knowing that she will never be the same.

Project

Question 1.
What makes Margot different from the other children? Why does this cause the other children dislike Margot?
Answer:
Margot is different from the other children because of her looks, her personality, and her experiences. Margot is “frail,” and she is fair-haired and white-skinned, so much so that she looks colorless, like a washed-out photograph. Margot is quiet and withdrawn—she doesn’t have the boisterous personality that many of the other children have. Her voice is soft, and often she doesn’t speak at all. She keeps her distance from the other children rather than joining in their antics. In fact, she is a very sensitive girl who seems to have some deep-seated emotional issues. When she screamed when the water touched her in the showers, that confirmed to the others how odd she was. Because she can remember living on Earth where the sun shone often, she finds the constant rain on Venus oppressive, and she seems to be depressed. That’s why her parents plan to send her back to Earth soon. She doesn’t fit in on Venus.                                                        ‘

Despite all those differences, the one thing that seems to set the children against Margot more than any other is that she has experiences they don’t share. All the other children have a homogeneous background: They have been raised on Venus and know nothing of life outside the underground complex they live in. That Margot remembers seeing the Sun and that she knows about life on Earth first-hand makes the children jealous of her, even though Margot doesn’t act like a know-it-all. Beyond that, the children know that she will have a chance to go back to Earth soon, a chance that evades the others. Her past experiences and her future plans set her apart from the others.

Why the other children dislike Margot is a strong theme in the story. Bradbury creates a scenario that allows modern Earth-bound readers to examine their prejudices. Margot represents the “other,” and human beings instinctively despise those outside their own tribe. Perhaps her rich and varied experiences caused them to wish they could escape their underground home, so they became jealous. The fact that she wouldn’t join their games might feel like an insult to them, so they lashed back to give her pain. But part of their dislike stems from a simple lust for power: Margot is weak and alone; they are strong and have numbers on their side. Such a condition spurs bullying, and that’s what happens in the story.

Although the story is overtly about children on a different planet in the future, it makes all readers, children and adults, think about how they treat others and whether they allow prejudices to mar their behavior.

Question 2.
What is the central conflict of the story “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
The central conflict of the story is that Margot does not fit in with the other children.

The basic situation is that it has been raining on Venus for seven years. The children, who are nine years old, do not remember ever seeing the sun. The sun is scheduled to come out, so the kids are very excited. Margot is excited too, but she is a child who just doesn’t fit in.     –

Margot is from Earth, and the other children are from Venus. In addition to that, Margot is delicate and sensitive and just doesn’t associate with the other kids.

‘They turned on themselves, like a feverish wheel, all tumbling spokes. Margot stood alone. She was a very frail girl who looked as if she had been lost in the rain for years and the rain had washed out the blue from her eyes and the red from her mouth and the yellow from her hair.’

The other kids tease Margot and don’t understand her. They are envious of her, and like many kids they turn that envy to cruelty. When the class is preparing for the sun to come out, the children tease Margot for the poem she wrote. She remembers the sun, and that really eats at them.

When the teacher leaves the room just as the sun is about to come out, the conflict comes to a head.

“Get away !” The boy gave her another push. “What’re you waiting for?”

Then, for the first time, she turned and looked at him. And what she was waiting for was in her eyes.

The boy tells Margot it was all a joke, and suggests they lock her in the closet. He is using her desperation and expectation against her, even though all of the children want the same thing. They are all ramped up, and need a target for their energy and aggression. Margot is an easy target.

Question 3.
What are examples of simile, metaphor, and personification in “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
Ray Bradbury’s short story “All Summer in a Day” has many different types of figures of speech. Similes compare two unlike things using the words “like” or “as.” Metaphors compare two unlike things using words like “is” or “was.” Personification occurs when an animal or inanimate object is given human traits or qualities. These figures of speech not only help to communicate what the author wants to portray in the story, but also help us to connect with something that we may have already understand, which then creates more meaning in the story. For example, the following is a passage that demonstrates the use of simile and metaphor:
All day yesterday they had read in class about the sun. About how like a lemon it was, and how hot.
And they had written small stories or essays or poems about it:

I think the sun is a flower,
That blooms for just one hour.
The first figure of speech is a simile because it compares the sun to a lemon using the word “like.” Then, a metaphor is used when the sun is compared to a flower using the word “is.”
The next passage has examples of two similes:
But Margot remembered.
“It’s like a penny,” she said once, eyes closed.,
“No it’s not!” the children cried.
“It’s like a fire,” she said, “in the stove.”
Both figures of speech in this passage are similes because the sun is compared to a penny and then to fire using the word “like.” The next example demonstrates how personification is used in the story:                                                                                     .

They stood looking at the door and saw it tremble from her beating and throwing herself against it.

In animate objects do not have the ability to tremble like people do; therefore, this is an example of personification. The door “trembles” because it receives the impact of Margot’s protest and anxiety about being trapped. It also seems as though Bradbury uses personification when Margot is locked in the closet to describe how her emotions powerfully transfer through the door as she pounds on it.

Question 4.
Why was Margot unhappy on Venus in “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
Margot is unhappy on Venus because she came from Earth and misses the sun.

The story takes place on Venus, a planet where it rains almost all of the time. In fact, the sun has not come out in seven years. Margot, however, came from Earth five years before the story starts. That means that unlike the other children in her class, she remembers what the sun looks like. She misses it terribly.

She sensed it, she was different and they knew her difference and kept away. ‘There was talk that her father and mother were taking her back to Earth next year; it seemed vital to her that they do so, though it would mean the loss of thousands of dollars to her family.’

Margot does not get along with the other children. She doesn’t play their games, and they are jealous of her for having recently been to Earth and for having the chance to go back. For this reason, the children bully Margot and she isolates herself. She doesn’t seem to make any friends.

On the day the sun is supposed to finally come out, the children decide to play a cruel trick on Margot. They tell her the scientists were wrong, and then lock her in a closet so that when it does come out, she won’t see it. She is horrified.

‘They surged about her, caught her up and bore her, protesting, and then pleading, and then crying, back into a tunnel, a room, a closet, where they slammed and locked the door. They stood looking at the door and saw it tremble from her beating and throwing * herself against it.’

The children are cruel bullies, the trick they played was terrible. Margot is very sensitive and this will likely have a great effect on her. They know this, and seem just as horrified when they realize what they have done. After the sun leaves, they go to take her out again knowing that she will never be the same.

Question 5.
What is the theme of all summer in a day by Ray Bradbury?
Answer:
The theme for “All Summer in a Day” is bullying and jealousy. Kids, and people alike, can be so mean when they are confronted with so pie one different than their current understanding or when they are jealous. Margot had known what the sun looked and felt like when she lived on Earth; but, the children of Venus who get to see the sun for two hours once every seven years could not relate to her experience. The children wouldn’t have locked Margot in the closet at that very special moment when the sun came out if it had not been for William. William is the antagonist who suggests that they lock her up because,. .the biggest crime of all was that she had come here only five years ago from Earth, and she remembered the sun and the way the sun was and the sky was when she was four in Ohio. And they, they had been on Venus all their lives, and they had been only two years old when last the sun came out and had long since forgotten the color and heat of it and the way it really was. But Margot remembered.”

Here we see the motive behind the rage and jealousy that the children felt for Margot. Whether it is one situation or another, Bradbury brings out a true principle of the human condition with this story; and that is the effect that jealousy can have when acted upon.

Question 6.
What is the climax of Ray Bradbury’s “All Summer in a Day?”
Answer:
The climax of Bradbury’s short story is when the sun comes out for the first time in seven years. The kids have locked Margot in a closet and to their astonishment, the sun comes out. They bolt outside to the sun, frolicking and playing in the illumination. They play until it begins to rain and then they have to come back inside. It becomes evident to them, in a dawning- like realization, that they had left Margot in the closet.

This moment of the sun appearing is the climax because it is the point in which the action is the greatest. In the conflict between Margot and the group of students, it is at this point where the tension between both is the highest in an almost contradictory moment of unity and symmetry. It is Bradbury’s genius to construct the situation so that Margot was actually right. Rather than praise her for her correct world view, the kids flock towards her absolute sense of accuracy and her vision, something that she is not able to appreciate because of being marginalized. The height of the plot, the moment where the action is most intense, is in this moment of unity, one in which there is validation but not for the person who advocated it. In this, there is a climax and a sense of diminishing action appears at the end when the children come to the silent realization that they have to release Margot out of the closet.

Question 7.
What is the setting of “All Summer in a Day”?
Answer:
The story is set in Venus sometime in the future on a day when the rain stops briefly.

A group of children are living on Venus. It rains every day for seven years. The children have not seen the sun in all that time. The children are nine years old, and have not seen the sun since it came out seven years before for an hour.

And this was the way of life forever on the planet Venus, and this was the schoolroom of the children of the rocket men and women who had come to a raining world to set up civilization and live out their lives.

A girl named Margot came from Earth, and remembers the sun. The other children are angry because she has seen it and they haven’t. On the one day the sun comes out they decide to lock her in a closet, and she misses the few minutes of sun.

The story demonstrates that children are children, no matter the setting. The children are cruel to Margot because she is different, and because they are jealous. Due to their actions, she misses seeing the sun. Only then do the children regret what they have done

For More Resources

 

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 9 My Greatest Olympic Prize

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 9 My Greatest Olympic Prize – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

Comprehension Passages

Passage 1

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

It was the summer of 1936. The Olympic Games were being held in Berlin. Because Adolf Hitler childishly insisted that his performers were members of a “master race,” nationalistic feelings were at an all-time high.

I wasn’t too worried about all this. I’d trained, sweated and disciplined myself for six years, with the Games in mind. While I was going over on the boat, all I could think about was taking home one or two of those gold medals. I had my eyes especially on the running broad jump. A year before, as a sophomore at the Ohio State, I’d set the world’s record of 26 feet 8 1/4 inches. Nearly everyone expected me to win this event.

Question 1.
Who is Jesse Owens?
Answer:
Jesse Owens is a black American athlete who set the world record in Long Jump

Question 2.
Why were nationalistic feelings running high during the 1936 Berlin Olympics?
Answer:
Adolf Hitler believed in Aryan Superiority theory. He thought that his German athletes belong to a master’s race and they would perform better than other participants in the 1936 Olympics, Berlin. So nationalistic feelings were running high.

Question 3.
Why was Owens expected to win the gold medal in the Long Jump hands down?
Answer:
Owens‘had set a world record in Long Jump just the previous year. So Owens knew he could win the Olympics hands down. Additionally he had practiced hard for the Olympics.

Question 4.
Why does Jesse Owens dismiss the claim of Hitler as childish?
Answer:
Hitler was a dictator, no doubt. But his casual remark to build up the spirit of his athletes had not been taken seriously by Owens because Owen had practiced hard and had even set the world record the previous year. Everyone was sure he would win the gold.

Question 5.
Explain, ‘I wasn’t too worried about all this. I’d trained, sweated disciplined myself for six years with the game in the mind.
Answer:
This passage is taken from, “My Greatest Olympic Prize” written by Jesse Owens. Jesse Owens shares his Olympic experience and the friendship he won. Patriotic feeling was running high in Germany. Owens did not bother as he trusted in his efforts.

Passage 2

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

I was in for a surprise. When the time came for the broad-jump trials, I was startled to see a tall boy hitting the pit at almost 26 feet on his practice leaps! He turned out to be a German named Luz Long. 1 was told that Hitler hoped to win the jump with him. I guessed that if Long won, it would add some new support to the Nazis’ “master race” (Aryan superiority) theory. After all, I am a Negro. Angr about Hitler’s ways, 1 determined to go out there and really show Der Fuhrer and his master race who was superior and who wasn’t. An angry athlete is an athlete who will make mistakes, as any coach will tell you. I was no exception. On the first of my three qualifying jumps, I leaped from several inches beyond the takeoff board for a foul. On the second jump, I fouled even worse. “Did I come 3,000 miles for this?” I thought bitterly. “To foul out of the trials and make a fool of myself ?” Walking a few yards from the pit, 1 kicked disgustedly at the dirt.

Question 1.
Why did Owens become hot under the collar before the trials?
Answer:
Owens was irritated about the Nazi’s Aryan superiority theory.

Question 2.
“I was no exception: – Explain.
Answer:
An angry athlete is prone to making mistakes. Despite knowing this, Owens got angry that
resulted in his underperformance which disallowed him to qualify in the first jump.

Question 3.
Why did Owens kick the pit in disgust?
Answer:
Owens leaped for several inches beyond the take-off point that ended up in disqualification in the first jump of his trials. He kicked the pit in disgust at his own poor performance.

Question 4.
I was in for a surprise. When the time came for the long jump trials, I was startled to see a tall boy hitting the pit at almost 26 feet on his practice leaps. What do these words mean?
Answer:
This passage is taken from, “My Greatest Olympic Prize” written by Jesse Owens. Jesse Owens shares his Olympic experience. Here he refers to Luz Long, the tall blond German athelete. He was surprised by his performance.

Question 5.
What shattered the confidence of Jesse Owens?
Answer:
He faulted twice in the qualifying jump.

Question 6.
“Did I come all the way from America for this?” I thought bitterly. “To foul out of the trials and make a fool of myself?” What does this show?
Answer:
Here Owens shows his frustration after failing twice in the qualifying jumps.

Question 7.
I supposed that if Long won, it would add some new support to the Nazis’ Aryan- superiority theory. What did Jesse Owens want to show to Hitler?
Answer:
Jesse wanted to show Hitler that he was not inferior .These lines are taken from, “My Greatest Olympic Prize” written by Jesse Owens. In, these lines Owen thinks what will happen if Germany wins. Then it would add truth to Hitler’s theory that the German race was superior and his athletes were meant to win.

Passage 3

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Then, trying to hide my nervousness, I added, “How are you?”
“I’m fine. The question is: How are you?“
“What do you mean?” 1 asked “Something must be eating you,” he said—proud the way foreigners are when they’ve mastered a bit of American slang. “You should be able to qualify with your eyes closed.”
“Believe me, I know it,” I told him—and it felt good to say that to someone.

For the next few minutes we talked together. I didn’t tell Long what was “eating” me, but he seemed to understand my anger, and he took pains to reassure me. Although he’d been schooled in the Nazi youth movement, he didn’t believe in the Aryan-supremacy business any more than I did. We laughed over the fact that he really looked the part, though. An inch taller than I, he had a lean, muscular frame, clear blue eyes, blond hair and a strikingly handsome, chiseled face. Finally, seeing that I had calmed down somewhat, he pointed to the take-off board.

“Look,” he said. “Why don’t you draw a line a few inches in back of the board and aim at making your take-off from there? You’ll be sure not to foul, and you certainly ought to jump far enough to qualify. What does it matter if you’re not first in the trials? Tomorrow is what counts.”

Question 1.
What was actually eating Jesse Owens?
Answer:
Owens was preoccupied with the disturbing thought of fouling in the finals.

Question 2.
Did Owens tell Long what was eating him? If not, why?
Answer:
Owens did not admit to Long what was eating him because Long was just an acquaintance then, apart from being a Nazi rival.

Question 3.
Describe Luz Long.
Answer:
Luz Long was taller than Owens with a lean muscular frame with clear blue eyes, fair hair and a strikingly handsome face.

Question 4.
How did Owens manage to qualify for the finals with a foot to spare?
Answer:
Owens accepted Long’s advice to draw a line a few inches behind the take-off board which helped him qualify for the finals with a foot to spare.

Question 5.
Why did Jesse Owens foul the first two jumps in the trial?
Answer:
Despite knowing that anger spoils the spirit of an athlete, forcing him to make mistakes, he was angered at Hitler’s sly introduction of Luz Long to prove Aryan superiority. Owens, being a Negro, hated it and his angered at Hitler’s way belittled his determination to win the Olympics. Anger ruled his mind and made him foul in the first two attempts in the trials.

Passage 4

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Suddenly all the tension seemed to ebb out of my body as the truth of what he said hit me. Confidently, I drew a line a full foot in back of the board and proceeded to jump from there. I qualified with almost a foot to spare.

That night I walked over to Luz Long’s room in the Olympic village to thank him. I knew that if it hadn’t been for him I probably wouldn’t be jumping in the finals the following day. We sat in his quarters and talked for two hours—about track and field, ourselves, the world situation, a dozen other things.

When I finally got up to leave, we both knew that a real friendship had been formed. Luz would go out to the field the next day trying to beat me if he could. But I knew that he wanted me to do my best—even if that meant my winning.

Question 1.
How did Luz Long help Jesse Owens?
Answer:
Luz Long, a true sportsman and an amazing human being, eased Owens’ tension by being compassionate. He gave him a genuinely friendly advice to draw a line a few inches from the takeoff board to avoid over-stepping and thus fouling. Owens took his advice and was able to qualify with a clean mind.

Question 2.
How did the rivalry of Owens and Long end?
Answer:
With Owens developing a misconception, the battle in his mind took over his determination to win. Long, who noticed Owens fouling, understood what Owens would be going through. Long’s decision to get acquainted with Owens eased Owens. Owens, after the trials, met Long in his quarters and both spent some quality time together knowing each other, thus leading to a long lasting true friendship.

Question 3.
How did Owens manage to qualify for the finals with a foot to spare?
Answer:
Luz Long was a tall German long jumper. Though he was trained by Hitler, he did not believe in Hitler’s theory. Jesse Owens was his opponent player but he was friendly with him and even helped him to get qualified for final. He suggested that Owen should draw a line behind take off board and then jump. Because of him, Jesse managed to qualify for the final.

Question 4.
Suddenly all the tension seemed to ebb out of my body as the truth of what he said hit me.
Answer:
This passage is taken from, “My Greatest Olympic Prize” written by Jesse Owens. Jesse Owens shares his Olympic experience and the friendship he won with Luz Long. After Long’s advice of marking few inches behind board Owens felt relaxed and confident at winning

Passage 5

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

As it turned out, Luz broke his own past record. In doing so, he pushed me on to a peak performance. I remember that at the instant I landed from my final jump—the one which set the Olympic record of 26 feet 5-5/16 inches—he was at my side, congratulating me. Despite the fact that Hitler glared at us from the stands not a hundred yards away, Luz shook my hand hard—and it wasn’t a fake “smile with a broken heart” sort of grip, either.

You can melt down all the gold medals and cups I have, and they couldn’t be a plating on the 24-carat friendship I felt for Luz Long at that moment. I realized then, too, that Luz was the epitome of what Pierre de Coubertin, founder of the modern Olympic Games, must have had in mind when he said, “The important thing in the Olympic Games is not winning but taking part. The essential thing in life is not conquering but fighting well.”

Question 1.
How did Luz Long respond to Jesse winning the gold?
Answer:
Long was beside Owens congratulating him when Owens finished his jump. He gave Owens a firm handshake that was devoid of any jealousy.

Question 2.
Why did Hitler glare at Luz Long and Jesse Owens?
Answer:
Hitler had nurtured Long to win the Olympics. Not only did Luz Long lose but was congratulating Owens heartily on his victory. This angered Hitler.

Question 3.
What, according to Coubertin, is the true spirit of the Olympics? Explain the reference to Coubertin.
Answer:
Coubertin had declared that taking part in Olympics was more important than winning. Coubertin had declared that taking part in Olympics was more important than winning. Luz Long, being a true sportsman and an amazing human being, helped his fellow sportsman to qualify in his jump that made him win. This shows Long believed in participating rather than winning. His rival’s winning did not make him jealous. On the contrary, he congratulated him with all his heart. This clearly exemplifies that Long believed in Coubertin’s words and passed the thought to Owens.                                              ‘

Question 4.
What do you understand of Hitler from Jesse’s account?
Answer:
Hitler had secretly nurtured a very strong Nazi youth and had kept him hidden until the day, to petrify other athletes, especially Owens. Hitler would have been fully aware that an angry athlete often errs and that perhaps was what he wanted. His slyness in doing so would allow his athlete to win, if not through competence, thus strengthening the Aryan superiority.

Question 5.
You can melt down all the gold medals and cups I have, and they wouldn’t be a plating on the 24-carat friendship I felt for Luz Long at that moment.
Answer:
This passage is taken from, “My Greatest Olympic Prize” written by Jesse Owens. Jesse Owens shares his Olympic experience. Jesse Owens feels that his friendship with Luz Long is greater than that of all the medals he has won. His friendship with his German rival and friend was worth more than anything and his greatest prize.

Assignment

Question 1.
How did Luz Long exemplify the true sporting spirit?
Answer:
Luz Long, noticing a world record holder pathetically fouling, understood the reason behind it, Without hesitation, despite being an opponent, he extends an arm of friendship to Owens. Long was expected to beat Owens in the finals, His being friendly with Owens only resulted in angering his leader, Hitler. Without paying heed to that, he also gave his rival crucial tips to avoid fouling, Owens took the advice and won.

When Owens finished his jump, he found Long by his side congratulating him on his victory, not bothering about his leader’s glares. He didn’t seem to mind his loss. His demeanor and handshake, at Owens’ victory, showed no sign of jealousy either. Long was the epitome of the message of Coubertin that not winning, but taking part in Olympics is more important.

Question 2.
Describe the professional rivalry and professional friendship of Owens and Long.
Answer:
Initially Owens saw Luz Long as his professional rival since Long was indeed brought in by Hitler to beat Owens. His anger led to his fouling in the trials. Long, who noticed the unnatural development of a crisis in a world record holder, counseled Owens to focus on the jump by giving him a valuable tip. This not only took Owens by surprise, but also eased him and allowed him the opportunity to believe in himself. Long thus broke the ice and they developed a bond. He later visited Long at his quarters and they spent some time knowing each other. This paved way for building a genuine friendship between the two. When Owens won the finals, Long was beside him congratulating him on his victory. Owens could sense no jealousy or regret in Long’s demeanor or handshake. It was a genuine wish coming right from the bottom of Long’s heart. He respected Long for it and knew that a strong friendship had bloomed between them.

Question 3.
Which is considered as the greatest Olympic prize? Why?
Answer:
Luz Long’s friendship was the greatest Olympic Prize that Owens ever won in his life. Luz Long’s compassion and camaraderie touched Owens. Luz Long recognized the battle in Owens’ mind and offered him a valuable tip. He was genuinely happy for Owens when he won the gold. He was by Owens’ side, congratulating him. It is very rare for a rival to offer professional tips but Long did. It is very rare for a rival to congratulate the winner without feeling a pang of jealousy. But Long felt none. What Long felt was evident in what he said and how he looked. His selflessness proves that he was an epitome of goodness and true sportsmanship. His congratulating Owens on his victory was of greater value to Owens than the gold medal itself. His genuine heart was so that Owens felt nothing could equalize the friendship that formed between the two.

Question 4.
Analyze the character of Luz Long.
Answer:
Luz Long, though trained in the Nazi youth school, evidently did not possess the sly characteristics of Nazis. His leader had brought him to take part in the Olympics to win. Long, though knowing the pressure on him, had not lost the spirit of a true sportsman. He had no inhibitions in offering his rival a very important tip even though it could have meant his failure. He saw his rival as a friend. Not just that, he was a good human being; he helped a person in distress. Long had nothing to hide. His intentions were clear. He had come to participate and winning to him was just a matter of effort.

Knowing that Owens was a record holder, he did not try any foul means to win the event. His camaraderie won the heart of Owens. Owens was swept off his feet at this magnificent Nazi’s pure heart and led to a friendship beyond all material richness of the game. Long nurtured no jealousy at his failure. He genuinely congratulated Owens. He remained unbothered about having to face the wrath of his leader for losing. Long broke the hope of his leader and his nation, but helped an able world record holder to set yet another record which he rightfully deserved. He also was by his rival’s side when he won the event. Long is the perfect example of a true sportsman.

For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 8 The Blue Bead

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 8 The Blue Bead – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

Comprehension Passages

Passage 1

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

From the day, perhaps a hundred years ago when he sun had hatched him in a sandbank, and he had broken his shell, and got his head out and looked around, ready to snap at anything, before he was even fully hatched-from that day, when he had at once made for the water, ready to fend for himself immediately, he had lived by his brainless craft and ferocity. Escaping the birds of prey and the great carnivorous fishes that eat baby crocodiles, he has prospered, catching all the food he needed, and storing it till putrid in holes in the bank. Tepid water to live in and plenty of rotted food grew him to his great length. Now nothing could pierce the inch-?thick armoured hide. Not even rifle bullets,

which would bounce off. Only the eyes and the soft underarms offered a place. He lived well in the river, sunning himself sometimes with other crocodiles-muggers, as well as the long-? snouted fish-?eating gharials-on warm rocks and sandbanks where the sun dried the clay on them quite white, and where they could plop off into the water in a moment if alarmed. The big crocodile fed mostly on fish, but also on deer and monkeys come to drink, perhaps a duck or two.

Question 1.
How old was the crocodile? How big?
Answer:
The crocodile was probably a hundred years old. He was twice the size of a tall man.

Question 2.
How did he survive as a baby crocodile from the day he was hatched.
Answer:
From the day he was hatched he was ready to snap at anything and he had survived with the help of his brainless craft and ferocity.

Question 3.
What posed a danger to him when he was young?
Answer:
The birds of prey and the great carnivorous fishes that eat baby crocodiles posed a danger to his survival when he was a bay crocodile.

Question 4.
What helped him grow to his present size?
Answer:
Tepid water to live in and plenty of rotted food grew him to his great length.

Question 5.
What protected him now? How?
Answer:
Now nothing could pierce the inch—?thick armoured hide. Not even rifle bullets, which would bounce off. Only the eyes and the soft underarms offered a place of vulnerability.

Question 6.
What did the big crocodile feed on?
Answer:
He fed on fish, but also on deer and monkeys who came to drink, perhaps a duck or two, corpses, dogs etc.

Passage 2

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Beside him in the shoals as he lay waiting glimmered a blue gem. It was not a gem, though: it was sand—?worn glass that had been rolling about in the river for a long time. By chance, it was perforated right through—the neck of a bottle perhaps?—a blue bead. In the shrill noisy village above the ford, out of a mud house the same colour as the ground came a little girl, a thin starveling child dressed in an earth—?coloured rag. She had torn the rag in two to make skirt and sari. Sibia was eating the last of her meal, chupatti wrapped round a smear of green chilli and rancid butter; and she divided this also, to make

it seem more, and bit it, showing straight white teeth. With her ebony hair and great eyes, and her skin of oiled brown cream, she was a happy immature child—?woman about twelve years old. Bare foot, of course, and often goosey—?cold on a winter morning, and born to toil. In all her life, she had never owned anything but a rag. She had never owned even one anna—not a pice.

Why does the writer mention the blue bead at the same time that the crocodile is introduced?

Ans. The author mentions the blue bead at the same time that the crocodile is introduced to create suspense and a foreshadowing of the events’to happen.

Question 1.
Describe the blue bead.
Answer:
The blue bead glimmered in the water. It was not a gem, though: it was sand—?worn glass that had been rolling about in the river for a long time. By chance, it was perforated right through—the neck of a bottle perhaps.

Question 2.
Describe Sibia’s home.
Answer:
Sibia lived in a mud hiuse which was the same colour as the ground.

Question 3.
Describe Sibia.
Answer:
Sibia was a little girl, a thin starving child dressed in an earth—?coloured rag, straight white teeth. With her ebony hair and great eyes, and her skin of oiled brown cream, she was a happy immature child—?woman about twelve years old. Bare foot, of course, and often goosey—?cold on a winter morning, and born to toil. In all her life, she had never owned anything but a rag. She had never owned even one anna—not a pice.

Question 4.
What was Sibia’s life like?
Answer:
Sibia was born to toil and had always lived in poverty. She had been working since childhood. In all her life, she had never owned any thing but a rag. She had never owned even one anna—not a pice.

Passage 3

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

The women came out on the shore, and made for the stepping—?stones. They had plenty to laugh and bicker about, as they approached the river in a noisy crowd. They girded up their skirts, so as to jump from stone to stone, and they clanked their sickles and forks together over their shoulders to have ease of movement. They shouted their quarrels above the gush of the river. Noise frightens crocodiles. The big mugger did not move, and all the women crossed in safety to the other bank. Here they had to climb a steep hillside to get at the grass, but all fell to with a will, and sliced away at it wherever there was foothold to be had. Down below them ran the broad river, pouring powerfully out from its deep narrow pools among the cold cliffs and shadows, spreading into warm shallows, lit by kingfishers. Great turtles lived there, and mahseer weighing more than a hundred pounds. Crocodiles too. Sometimes you could see them lying out on those slabs of clay over there, but there were none to be seen at the moment.

Question 1.
Why did the women rolled their skirts up?
Answer:
The women girded their skirts so as to jump from stone to stone and this gave them ease of movement.

Question 2.
What did the women carry?
Answer:
They carried sickles and hay forks to cut and gather the dried grass.

Question 3.
Why did they shout louder than the sound of the water?
Answer:
They shouted louder than the sound of the water because noise frightens crocodiles.

Question 4.
What were they doing on the hill?
Answer:
The women climbed the hill to reach the grass there and cut it with their sickles and then gather with their hay forks so that they could take it and sell in the market.

Question 5.
What all lived in the river below the hill?
Answer:
In the river below the hill lived great turtles, and mahseer weighing more than a hundred pounds. Crocodiles too.

Passage 4

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Sibia sprang.
From boulder to boulder she came leaping like a rock goat. Sometimes it had seemed difficult to cross these stones, especially the big gap in the middle where the river coursed through like a bulge of glass. But now she came on wings, choosing her footing in midair without even thinking about it, and in one moment she was beside the shrieking woman. In the boiling bloody water, the face of the crocodile, fastened round her leg, was tugging to and fro, and smiling. His eyes rolled on to Sibia. One slap of the tail could kill her. He struck. Up shot the water, twenty feet, and fell like a silver chain. Again! The rock jumped under the blow. But in the daily heroism of the jungle, as common as a thorn tree, Sibia did not hesitate. She aimed at the reptile’s eyes. With all the force of her little body, she drove the hayfork at the eyes, and one prong went in—right in— while its pair scratched past on the horny cheek. The crocodile reared up in convulsion, till half his lizard body was out of the river, the tail and nose nearly meeting over his stony back. Then he crashed back, exploding the water, and in an uproar of bloody foam he disappeared. He would die. Not yet, but presently, though his death would not be known for days; not till his stomach, blown with gas, floated him. Then perhaps he would be found upside down among the logs at the timber boom, with pus in his eye. Sibia got arms round the fainting woman, and somehow dragged her from the water.

Question 1.
Why does Sibia think of the two brass vessels when the Gujar woman is attacked?
Answer:
Sibia thought of the two brass vessels when the Gujar woman was attacked because she was poor enough to understand the value of two brass vessals.

Question 2.
Describe how Sibia flew to save the woman.
Answer:
Sibia leapt forward from boulder to boulder. She came leaping with the agility of a rock goat. Sometimes it had seemed difficult to cross these stones, especially the big gap in the middle where the river coursed through like a bulge of glass. But now she came on wings, choosing her footing in midair without even thinking about it, and in one moment she was beside the shrieking woman.

Question 3.
What was the reaction of the crocodile when he saw Sibia?
Answer:
When the crocodile saw Sibia his eyes rolled on to Sibia. One slap of the tail could kill her. He struck. Up shot the water, twenty feet, and fell like a silver chain. He again tried to strike with his tail. The rock jumped under the blow.

Question 4.
How does Sibia save the woman?
Answer:
Sibia displayed great courage and fearlessness in saving the woman from being devoured by the crocodile. Sibia did not hesitate. She aimed at the reptile’s eyes. With all the force of her little body, she drove the hay fork at the eyes, and one prong went in—right in— while its pair scratched past on the horny cheek.

Question 5.
What would happen to the crocodile?
Answer:
He would die. Not yet, but presently, though his death would not be known for days; not till his stomach, blown with gas, floated him. Then perhaps he would be found upside down among the logs at the timber boom, with pus in his eye.

Passage 5

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Then there it lay in her wet palm, perfect, even pierced ready for use, with the sunset shuffled about inside it like gold—?dust. All her heart went up in flames of joy. After a bit she twisted it into the top of her skirt against her tummy so she would know if it burst through the poor cloth and fell. Then she picked up her fork and sickle and the heavy grass and set off home. Ai! Ai! What a day! Her barefeet smudged out the wriggle— ?mark of snakes in the dust; there was the thin singing of malaria mosquitoes among the trees now; and this track was much used at night by a morose old makna elephant—the Tuskless One; but Sibia was not thinking of any of them. The stars came out: she did not notice. On the way back she met her mother, out of breath, come to look for her, and scolding. “I did not see till I was home, that you were not there. I thought something must have happened to you.” And Sibia, bursting with her story, cried “Something did). I found a blue bead for my necklace, look!”

Question 1.
Why did Sibia feel overjoyed?
Answer:
Sibia felt overjoyed when she saw the blue bead lying on the ground next to her hay fork. It was perfect for her necklace. Even pierced ready for use, with the sunset shuffled about inside it like gold—?dust.

Question 2.
Where did she keep it?
Answer:
Sibia twisted it into the top of her skirt against her tummy so she would know if it burst through the poor cloth and fell.

Question 3.
What all did Sibia not notice as she went home?
Answer:
Sibia was so full of joy at finding the blue bead that she did not notice the thin singing of malaria mosquitoes among the trees, nor was she worried that she might come across the dangerous old makna elephant—the Tuskless One or that the stars had come out in the sky and night was falling.

Question 4.
Why did Sibia not tell her mother about her fight with the crocodile or how she saved the woman?
Answer:
Sibia was so excited and happy that she had found the blue bead and now she could make a necklace that all other things were insignificant. The only thing of importance for her was that now she also could have jewellery which she had always wanted but was too poor to get.

Question 5.
Is the Ending Appropriate?
Answer:
Yes, the ending was appropriate because it not only shows Sibia is a brave young woman who put her own life in danger for the safety of the older woman but it is also evident, at the end of the story that how humble Sibia. She told her mom about the blue bead she came across, but did not mention her heroic act.

Assignment

Question 1.
Show how the story shows a conflict between humans and nature.
Answer:
The Blue bead is a story about conflicts.lt is the story of Sibia, story of a twelve year old Indian girl who saved a gujjar woman from being devoured by a crocodile. There was a mugger crocodile laying in the water, A little 12-year-old girl name Sibia lived in a small village and she was marked for work from a very young age. She had never owned anything in her life In the village the woman would get paper grass from above the river. When they had enough they would take it to the bullock and sell it for money. One day when they were crossing the river on their way home, Sibia decided to rest. One of the Gujjar women went down to fill her two gurrahs with water. Things took a turn for the worst and all of a sudden a crocodile attacked the woman, biting on the woman’s leg. At that moment Sibia got up, sprinted, grabbed the hayfork and stabbed the crocodile in the eye with all her power. Immediately the crocodile let go and went away. Sibia saw a small blue bead lying by the river, she grabbed it. Since she was poor she didn’t have a necklace. She’d always wanted one like the other women, now she could make one with the blue bead. After that she went home and told her mother all about it.

There are various conflicts in the story. Sibia wants jewellery but cannot afford it. Has to work much harder than any child should and struggles to survive. Everyday Sibia has to cross the Indian River which is full of crocodiles. The grown Gujjar women is attacked by the crocodile and the twelve year old Sibia kills the crocodile and saves the women.

Then there is the conflict of lack of wealth in Sibia’s family. The author states in the beginning of the story:”She was a happy immature child woman, about 12 years old. Bare foot, of course, and often goosey cold on a winter morning, and born to toil. In all her life, she had owned anything but a rag.”

Another major conflict highlighted in the story is Human versus Nature. The conflict was that a woman was attacked by a crocodile and Sibia was there to save the woman. This conflict served the purpose of telling us how brave and courageous Sibia was and how she found the blue bead.Crocodiles often attack humans in India and surrounding countries. It’s very unlikely that one would survive an attack,but luckily, Sibia was there to save that woman.

Question 2.
Can we say that it is a story about heroism and a true soldier?
Answer:
In the short story A Blue Bead the author has given an account about how inherent courage can make even a child fight the greatest odds. It is comparable to the story from the Bible of David and Goliath.

Sibia is only twelve years old but is ready to help others even at the cost of endangering her own life. When she lunges at the crocodile, not for a moment does she think of saving herself and running. Infact she behaves like a true soldier thinking of others before self. Yes, the woman would be dead if Sibia didn’t rescue her. In the end also she did not give importance to her act of bravery.

She was fearless and quick footed . When she saw the woman being attacked, Sibia leapt forward from boulder to boulder. She came leaping with the agility of a rock goat. Sometimes it had seemed difficult to cross these stones, especially the big gap in the middle where the river coursed through like a bulge of glass. But now she came on wings, choosing her footing in midair without even thinking about it, and in one moment she was beside the shrieking woman. She was adventurous and courageous. ‘With all the force in (Sibia’s) little body, she drove the hayfork at the eyes, and one prong went right in.’ Sibia shows that she is capable of disabling the crocodile, she demonstrates courage in an overwhelming, impressive manner Even after rescuing the woman from the crocodile she helped her and tended her wounds. “Sibia got her arms around the fainting woman…she stopped her wounds with sand, and bound them with a rag.” Sibia represents herself as a hero in this portion of the story, as she successfully defeated the crocodile in order to save a woman. Sibia is only 12 years old, but without hesitation or a second thought, she kills a crocodile. “With all the force in her little body, she drove the hayfork at the eyes, and with one prong went in -right in- while it’s pair scratched past on the horny cheek… He would die.” Therefore, inspite of with Sibia’s young age, she simply attains courage to execute a vicious crocodile.

Question 3.
Show how the story demonstrates that a good deed begets good.
Answer:
Sibia was a little 12-year-old girl name who lived in a small village and was marked for work from a very young age. She had never owned anything in her life. In the village the woman would get paper grass from above the river. When they had enough they would take it and sell it for money. One day when they were crossing the river on their way home, Sibia decided to rest. One of the Gujjar women went down to fill her two gurrahs with water. Things took a turn for the worst and all of a sudden a crocodile attacked the woman, biting on the woman’s leg. At that moment Sibia got up, sprinted, grabbed the hay fork and stabbed the crocodile in the eye with all her power. Immediately the crocodile let go and went away. Sibia saw a small blue bead lying by the river, she grabbed it. Since she was poor she didn’t have a necklace. She’d always wanted one like the other women, now she could make one with the blue bead.

Sibia wants jewellery but cannot afford it. Has to work much harder than any child should and struggles to survive. Everyday Sibia has to cross the Indian River which is full of crocodiles. The grown Gujjar women is attacked by the crocodile and the twelve year old Sibia kills the crocodile and saves the woman.

The blue bead symbolizes that even the little things can make Sibia happy. We take many things for granted and don’t realize the little things that make us happy. The blue bead represents Sibia’s happiness because she grew up in poverty. The blue bead is used as a symbol, it represents the riches and luxuries that she could never afford, and all she fought for in order to achieve it. It is also a symbol and reminder of her bravery and heroism on that day. So she could never hope to buy jewellery but her good deed gets her a reward in the form of the bead which she could use to make a necklace for herself.

Question 4.
Describe the picture of India given by the author.
Answer:
The Blue Bead is the story of an Indian girl who lives in a mud house the same colour as the groun Most of the people in India in the villages belonging to poor class live in such houses . Sibia like most Indian labourers is dressed ‘in a rag torn in two to make skirt  and sari. Sibia was eating the last of her meal, chupatti wrapped round a smear of green chilli and rancid butter; and she divided this also, to make it seem more. She was bare foot, and often goosey—?cold on a winter morning, and born to toil. In all her life, she had never owned anything but a rag. She had never owned even one anna—not a pice.’This could be the description of any poor beggar or labourer in India. The author also describes the animals that abound in the jungles of India. The huge crocodile which was twice the size of a tal man and was a danger to all who tried to cross the great Indian river. There is a mention of the great turtles who lived in the waters of the river and the mahseer weighing more than a hundred pounds. The author casually writes that you could see the crocodiles Tying out on those slabs of clay over there.’ Another Indian menace which is there is the ‘singing of malaria mosquitoes among the Malaria and some waterborne diseases kill infect and kill many Indians in the villages.Then the author also mentions the elephants to be found in the jungles, ‘morose old makna elephant—the Tuskless One.

 For More Resources

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 7 The Little Match Girl

Treasure Trove A Collection of ICSE Short Stories Workbook Answers Chapter 7 The Little Match Girl – ICSE Class 10, 9 English

EnglishMathsPhysicsChemistryBiology

ICSE SolutionsSelina ICSE SolutionsML Aggarwal Solutions

Comprehension Passages

Passage 1

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Most terribly cold it was; it snowed, and was nearly quite dark, and evening— the last evening of the year. In this cold and darkness there went along the street a poor little girl, bareheaded, and with naked feet. When she left home she had slippers on, it is true; but what was the good of that? They were very large slippers, which her mother had hitherto worn; so large were they; and the poor little thing lost them as she scuffled away across the street, because of two carriages that rolled by dreadfully fast.

One slipper was nowhere to be found; the other had been laid hold of by an urchin, and off he ran with it; he thought it would do capitally for a cradle when he some day or other should have children himself. So the little maiden walked on with her tiny naked feet, that were quite red and blue from cold. She carried a quantity of matches in an old apron, and she held a bundle of them in her hand. Nobody had bought anything of her the whole livelong day; no one had given her a single farthing. She crept along trembling with cold and hunger—a very picture of sorrow, the poor little thing!

Question 1.
Which day of the year was it in the story?
Answer:
It was terribly cold. It snowed, and it was nearly quite dark. It was New Year’s eve and the night was freezing cold.

Question 2.
Describe the condition of the girl.
Answer:
The little girl was bare headed and barefoot in the freezing cold as she had lost the slippers she had worn which belonged to her mother and were too large for her. Her feet were quite red and blue from cold.

Question 3.
What did the girl carry in her pocket?
Answer:
The little girl carried a quantity of matches in an old apron, and she held a bundle of them in her hand.

Question 4.
Had she managed to sell any matches?
Answer:
Nobody had bought anything of her the whole livelong day; no one had given her a single farthing.

Question 5.
Does the author give us a glimpse into the Victorian society?
Answer:
Yes, we get a glimpse into the society in which parents were cruel enough to make their * small children work in the freezing cold. Begging was a menace and child abuse was common.

Passage 2

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

Lights were shining from every window, and there was a savoury smell of roast goose, for it was New-year’s eve—yes, she remembered that. In a corner, between two houses, one of which projected beyond the other, she sank down and huddled herself together. She had drawn her little feet under her, but she could not keep off the cold; and

she dared not go home, for she had sold no matches, and could not take home even a penny of money. Her father would certainly beat her; besides, it was almost as cold at home as here, for they had only the roof to cover them, through which the wind howled, although the largest holes had been stopped up with straw and rags. Her little hands were almost frozen with the cold. Ah! perhaps a burning match might be some good, if she could draw it from the bundle and strike it against the wall, just to warm her fingers. She drew one out—“scratch!” how it sputtered as it burnt! It gave a warm, bright light, like a little candle, as she held her hand over it. It was really a wonderful light. It seemed to the little girl that she was sitting by a large iron stove, with polished brass feet and a brass ornament. How the fire burned! and seemed so beautifully warm that the child stretched out her feet as if to warm them, when, lo! the flame of the match went out, the stove vanished, and she had only the remains of the half-burnt match in her hand.

Question 1.
Where did the girl seek some shelter from the cold?
Answer:
The girl in order to escape the freezing cold huddled in a corner, between two houses, one of which projected beyond the other. She had drawn her little feet under her, but she could not keep off the cold.

Question 2.
Why could the girl not go home?
Answer:
The little girl did not dare to go home, for she had sold no matches, and could not take home even a penny of money. Her father would certainly beat her for earning no money.

Question 3.
Describe her home.
Answer:
Her house was in as poor a condition as her. It was almost as cold at home as on the street because they had only the roof to cover them. They lacked adequate woollens to keep them warm. There also the wind howled through the cracks, although the largest holes had been stopped up with straw and rags.

Question 4.
How did she try to keep herself warm?
Answer:
She thought of lighting her matches to keep herself warm .

Question 5.
What did she imagine when she lighted the first match?
Answer:
When she lighted the first match it seemed to give a warm, bright light, like a little candle. It was really a wonderful light. It seemed to the little girl that she was sitting by a large iron stove, with polished brass feet and a brass ornament. How the fire burned! and it seemed so beautifully warm that the child stretched out her feet as if to warm them.

Passage 3

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

She lighted another match, and then she found herself sitting under a beautiful Christmas-tree. It was larger and more beautifully decorated than the one which she had seen through the glass door at the rich merchant’s. Thousands of tapers were burning upon the green branches, and colored pictures, like those she had seen in the show- windows, looked down upon it all. The little one stretched out her hand towards them, and the match went out.

The Christmas lights rose higher and higher, till they looked to her like the stars in the sky. Then she saw a star fall, leaving behind it a bright streak of fire. “Someone is dying,” thought the little girl, for her old grandmother, the only one who had ever loved her, and who was now dead, had told her that when a star falls, a soul was going up to God.

Question 1.
What did she see when she lighted another match?
Answer:
When the girl lighted another match she saw herself sitting under a beautiful Christmas- tree. It was larger and more beautifully decorated than the one which she had seen through the glass door at the rich merchant’s.

Question 2.
Describe the Christmas tree.
Answer:
The Christmas tree was beautifully decorated. There were thousands of tapers were burning upon the green branches, and coloured pictures, like those she had seen in the show-windows, looked down upon it all.

Question 3.
What happened when she stretched her hand to touch?
Answer:
As soon as she stretched her hand to touch the match went out and the tree disappeared.

Question 4.
How did the Christmas lights appear when the match went out?
Answer:
When the match went out the Christmas lights rose higher and higher, till they looked to her like the stars in the sky. Then she saw a star fall, leaving behind it a bright streak of fire.

Question 5.
Why did the girl think that “Someone is dying” ?
Answer:
The girl thought that “Someone is dying” because her old grandmother, the only one who had ever loved her, and who was now dead, had told her that when a star falls, a soul was going up to God.

Passage 4

Read the extract given below and answer the questions that follow.

She again rubbed a match on the wall, and the light shone round her; in the brightness stood her old grandmother, clear and shining, yet mild and loving in her appearance. “Grandmother,” cried the little one, “O take me with you; I know you will go away when the match burns out; you will vanish like the warm stove, the roast goose, and the large, glorious Christmas-tree.” And she made haste to light the whole bundle of matches, for she wished to keep her grandmother there. And the matches glowed with a light that was brighter than the noon-day, and her grandmother had never appeared so large or so beautiful. She took the little girl in her arms, and they both flew upwards in brightness and joy far above the earth, where there was neither cold nor hunger nor pain, for they were with God.

In the dawn of morning there lay the poor little one, with pale cheeks and smiling mouth, leaning against the wall; she had been frozen to death on the last evening of the year; and the New-year’s sun rose and shone upon a little corpse! The child still sat, in the stiffness of death, holding the matches in her hand, one bundle of which was burnt. “She tried to warm herself,” said some. No one imagined what beautiful things she had seen, nor into what glory she had entered with her grandmother, on New-year’s day.

Question 1.
What happened when she lighted another match?
Answer:
When she lighted another match the light shone round her and in the brightness stood her old grandmother, clear and shining, yet mild and loving in her appearance.

Question 2.
What did the girl say to her grandmother? Why?
Answer:
The girl pleaded with her grandmother to take her along with her because she was the only one in the world who loved her.

Question 3.
Why did the girl make haste to light the whole bundle of matches?
Answer:
The girl made haste to light the whole bundle of matches, for she wished to keep her grandmother there. And the matches glowed with a light that was brighter than the noon day, and her grandmother had never appeared so large or so beautiful. She took the little girl in her arms, and they both flew upwards in brightness and joy far above the earth, where there was neither cold nor hunger nor pain, for they were with God.

Question 4.
What happened to the little girl? What did the people think?
Answer:
The little girl died and the people saw that one bundle of matches was burnt. They said she had tried to warm herself.

Question 5.
Why was there a smile on the girl’s lips? Did the people understand?
Answer:
The girl had a smile on her face when she died because she was relinquishing a world of pain and suffering and was reunited with the person she loved the most, her grandmother and God.No one imagined what beautiful things she had seen, nor into what glory she had entered with her grandmother, on New-year’s day. They had no idea about the beautiful pictures she had seen.

Assignment

Question 1.
The author shows death as a relief from a harsh life. Justify with reference to the story.
Answer:
In the snowy streets of the city a pitiable young girl is selling matches on New Years Eve in a desperate attempt to appease her father’s violent anger. Alone with her matches and their accompanying visions the girl passes on and is found later the next day, dead and with a smile playing across her face. The plot of The Little Match Girl by Hans Christian

Anderson is meant to inspire a charity of tears for this young girl and her untimely death. However not in all instances should such a death be so unfortunate In the little match girls case death would not be the worst of all evils but an alleviation to mortals who are worn out with sufferings. Thus death can come as a relief to those whose toils and cares overcome the will to live and when a better life can only be satisfied by fate. Firstly, for some, peace and comfort can only be obtained in death. The little match girl seeks such comfort in the streets but obviously finds none in the bitter bleak night. Once she is quite numb with cold, she thinks that a little match would be a comfort. So light here represents the comfort of heat. For example when she does light the match it blazes into a clear warm flame, which transforms with a little help from her imagination into a warm friendly fire. When the match goes out the stove vanishes and she is left again to suffer the icy night. So peace and contentment cannot always be found in this life but the one after death. Therefore death need not be viewed as the ultimate evil as for many it can be a release into a better life.

Question 2.
Anderson through the story a Little Match Girl gives an idea about the Victorian society of his times?
Answer:
Andersen portrays in this tale not only a realistic and crude view of society in Victorian times, but also a deep criticism of social class differentiation. During those times, children were not regarded the same way people regard them nowadays. Instead, they were viewed as ‘miniature adults’ and were usually used for cheap labour.

Andersen takes advantage of these strong social differences to leave a moral teaching at the end of his tale, this consists of the idea that children should be considered as creative people, able to transcend difficult situations through the power of imagination.

The girl, suffering from the cold and the ignorance of the people around her and maybe as a result of these, is still capable of imagining certain things that would make her feel better about her situation- huge Christmas trees, a table full of Christmas food and her grandmother’s loving face.

Andersen describes the social stratification of Victorian times in just a few sentences. During this historical period, while the ‘middle class’ emerged and took over an important percentage of work places, the ‘under class’ grew resentful of both aristocracy and middle class, remaining unemployed and living in poverty. Although Andersen does not explain the girl’s background, he denotes social differentiation by opposing the extremes. The reader understands that the girl and her family stand on the less fortunate side, and it also gives him/her an idea of their social impediments. Nevertheless, it can only be assumed that the story is set during Victorian times, mainly because Andersen lived during this period.

Question 3.
The Little Match Girl can be viewed as a work of opposites. Justify.
Answer:
Little Match Girl can be viewed as a work of opposites can be analysed as a work of opposites. Andersen plays with the interaction between violence and love, poverty and wealth, struggle and redemption, life and death. These constant relationships are displayed in such a manner that keeps us entertained during the reading process, and we are later left with a moral learning.

The author talks about segregation, religious faith and human relationships.Instead of getting love and care from her father, the girl only got blows for not selling matches. The girl sees only her old grandmother as the only loving relationship and views her, ‘bright and radiant, so mild, and with such an expression of love.’

The family situation of the little girl and her experiences daily show that parents of such poor children did not care if it was cold outside. They send their daughter out to sell matches anyway. The girl does not have the appropriate clothing to shelter herself from the winter cold. She is not capable of selling any matches and scared to return home because her father would beat her for her poor work. Instead of going back, the girl prefers to sit in the snow and imagine her grandmother’s face, full of tenderness and love. The reminder of her grandmother’s love helps her to keep warm and get through this painful moment, as passers-by remain oblivious to her suffering, ;just like her parents.

She is now dead in the cold winter, but with a smile on her face because she is with her grandmother and God. This can be seen as an allegory for Christian faith, in regards to the notion that good people go to heaven to enter heaven. This explains the fact that the little girl suffered during her lifetime which denotes a more significant sense of purpose to the girl’s struggle and the tale’s ending.

Question 4.
The story propagates the idea that dreams are necessary to remain happy, even if for a short while.
Answer:
The little match girl didn’t have any desire to go home since it was a cold attic where her violent father would hit her often. The wind that was blowing from all sides of that attic didn’t leave any room for a happy family. She thought how to get warm so he decided to light up one match. After she lit up another match she dreamt. And in her dream saw a beautiful set table with a lot of food. The turkey on the table started moving and went towards her but she never came to the girl because the match burned out. She decided to light up another one and she saw a decorated Christmas tree and many candles around it. When she reached her hands to touch it the light went out.

All of the candles started to rise towards the sky and one star fell down, leaving behind a mark. The girl thought that it meant somebody died and that it was their soul. In that moment she saw her grandma and in order to keep her near she lit up all of the matches. Her grandma took her with her to a place where hunger and coldness were gone.

The next morning she was found frozen with a smile on her face. Everybody commented on her attempts to keep herself warm but nobody knew she waited for New Year with the prettiest pictures and dreams in her mind. Her dreams made her happy and she could no longer feel the cold or the harshness of the world around her. She was at peace.

Question 5.
Anderson’s story shows the young girl having visions. Through them Anderson gives didactic and moralistic lessons. Discuss.
Answer:
This story is said to have taken place in a town around the early 20th Century. The story consists of a small girl no older than eleven, sent out to sell matches, which during that time was considered a form of begging. It is the dead of winter and she has little to keep her warm. Her ill fitting shoes had been taken from her, and with the fear of going home only to be beaten for her unsuccessful sales, she curls up in the cold. As she is struggling to keep warm all she can contemplate is the thought of lighting one small match. Then, as she does so, she is filled with feelings of warmth and safety as she sits beneath a large iron stove. She continues to light matches and get extraordinary visions, each one better than before.

During the early 20th century many people paid no mind to the poor “[since] begging was illegal during Andersen’s time the poor would make matches and sell them on the street as a front for their actual begging” Child abuse, was also common during this time.

As the girl lights her first match, she sees a vision of a large warm iron stove. But soon the stove disappears. All that is left are the gray/black remains of a burnt-out match. “Like black, gray is used as a colour of mourning as well as a colour of formality”. This shows that before the little girl has reached her fate the signs of mourning are already presenting themselves.

During the Second vision Hans Christian Anderson wrote of a magical New Years Eve Feast that any poor hungry child would be overjoyed to partake in, he said, “where the light fell on the wall, there the wall became transparent like a veil, so that she could see into the room. On the table was spread a snow-white tablecloth; upon it was a splendid porcelain service, and the roast goose was steaming famously with its stuffing of apple and dried plums. And what was still more capital to behold was, the goose hopped down from the dish, reeled about on the floor with knife and fork in its breast, till it came up to the poor little girl; when—the match went out and nothing but the thick, cold, damp wall was left behind.” It is a vision about Thanksgiving feast, a Christian belief that we must feed the hungry on such days.

During this time the poor could only dream of partaking in such an extravagant meal. Salaries were small and for some, times were very hard. This vision addresses how hungry the small girl truly is, and if she doesn’t freeze she shall surely starve.

The Third Vision of the night, only to be seen after the striking of another match, is. a magnificent Christmas tree. It is brightly light and beautifully decorated. It was the sort of tree only to be found in a very wealthy home. As the colors and lights rise, and the tree disappears, the stars become visible, and it seems as though the lights from the tree have become the stars. The little girl then sees a star fall and claims “Someone is just dead!” “For her old grandmother, the only person who had loved her, and who was now no more, had told her, that when a star falls, a soul ascends to God”. A Creole superstition states: ‘Shooting-stars are souls escaping from purgatory: if you can make a good wish three times before the star disappears, the wish will be granted’. This is almost as if the three visions before were wishes, but it is also thought, that it is either the young girl’s soul ascending into heaven, or yet the cause for the final vision.

The small girl drew another match, and there her loving grandmother stood before her in the dark of the night, with no reservations, only kindness. The little girl knew that if the match were to run out her grandmother would disappear just like all her other wonderful visions, so in turn she struck the entire rest of the bundle on the wall. “Many near-death experiences around the world, regardless of religious belief, involve the visitation of dead loved-ones, usually family members and close friends” The little girl pleads with her grandmother to take her back to heaven so “she took the little maiden, on her arm, and both flew in brightness and in joy so high, so very high, and then above was neither cold, nor hunger, nor anxiety—they were with God”.

Nearly 1,876 patients were treated in American hospitals for hypothermia in 2010/ 11.This hits close to home with The Little Match Girl, seeing as how she froze to death on an icy New Years Eve. The next morning the townspeople found the girl frozen in a corner, matches in hand, smile on her face, and all they can think of is how she must have tried to warm herself. Not one person stops and thinks of the beautiful splendour the girl saw. Hans Christian Anderson believed this was a happy ending in his book to relinquish the suffering of a little girl only to be joined with her one true relative and God. Anderson’s story serves a good purpose “reminding people to be charitable and help the poor during the holidays, ..id hopefully year round, to keep young children from suffering with poverty and death.” This isn’t much of a fairy tale, more so a“folk tale for adults. These tales were often told orally during the times when the peasants could not read. They passed them down through the generations, and the folk tales were eventually illustrated and sold as fairy tales for children. In conclusion, Anderson’s short tale is not only a sad holiday story reminding us to give during the season, but a reality check.

For More Resources